Giant Prehistoric Penguin was Bigger Than an Emperor

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Scientists have reconstructed the skeleton of a prehistoric penguin species, and found that its body was unlike any previously known penguin.

“It’s almost like someone took an emperor penguin and stretched it out,” says Daniel Ksepka, an avian paleontologist at North Carolina State University who helped to reassemble the fossils. The new species (from the genus Kairuku) is sleeker and more slender than other penguins. It has lengthy flippers for its size and a long and narrow beak. And at four feet two inches tall, the svelte Kairuku was nearly 12 inches taller than the tallest living penguin today, the emperor penguin.

The first nearly complete Kairuku skeleton was discovered in 1977, but more recent discoveries helped to fill in some of the missing pieces of the body plan. The first complete reconstruction of the 25-million-year-old penguin is slated for publication on March 1 in the Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Kairuku and at least five other types of prehistoric penguins lived together in New Zealand, which in modern times has the highest diversity of living penguins. But Kairuku went extinct without leaving any descendents. “They’re not related to living species, but they were an interesting side chapter,” says Ksepka. “It’s cool to see a new type of penguin, and it highlights the fact that this was really a diverse ecosystem of penguins.”

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe