Gigantic Feathered Dinosaur Fossils Found in China

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


A new species of feathered dinosaur has been discovered, and its gigantic size makes it the largest-known feathered animal, living or extinct.

Yutyrannus huali lived in northeastern China 125 million years ago, according to a group of scientists in China, where three specimens of the bipedal tyrannosaur were found. A description of the new dinosaur is published in the March 5 issue of Nature. (Scientific American is part of Nature Publishing Group.)

Only a meter shorter than Tyrannosaurus rex, Yutyrannus weighed at least 1,400 kilograms and was nine meters long, or almost the length of a school bus, with filamentous plumage at least on its neck, pelvis and legs. The researchers think that the feathers, which in some cases were as long as a brand new No. 2 pencil, covered Yutyrannus’s entire body.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Before now, Beipiaosaurus was the largest-known non-avian feathered dinosaur, and it was a huggable turkey-sized mass just two meters or so long. Scientists never expected to find plumage on a dinosaur as large as Yutyrannus, because, at least in mammals, larger-sized animals retain heat more efficiently than small animals. That puts larger animals at higher risk of overheating in warm weather, so insulative features such as feathers or fur are often lost in large mammals.

Yet Yutyrannus demonstrates that the loss of plumage is not necessarily a consequence of large size in dinosaurs. Xing Xu, a paleontologist at the Chinese Academy of Sciences's Institute for Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, who led the study, said that Yutyrannus may be unique among gigantic dinosaurs because it lived in a climate that was cooler by eight degrees Celsius than other dinosaur habitats at that time—perhaps Yutyrannus needed the feathers to keep warm.

There is another possible explanation. Some gigantic maniraptoran dinosaurs (or “raptors,” a sister group to tyrannosaurs which includes extant bird species) are assumed to have possessed feathers, but direct evidence of plumage has never been found. If paleontologists find additional gigantic dinosaurs with feathers, it may be that dinosaurs are not governed by the same thermodynamic rules as mammals. That would certainly ruffle some feathers.

 

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe