Green Glow Shows RNA Editing in Real Time

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


It's a long way from gene to protein. The dogmatic scenario is: DNA gets transcribed into RNA, which gets translated into protein. But in real life, and in real living things, the workings aren't quite that simple.

One example: individual units of RNA sometimes need to be converted, in what's called RNA editing, into related entities for the ultimate formation of the right proteins. An enzyme called ADAR (adenosine deaminase, RNA-specific) is responsible for a specific such alteration important for good nervous system function.

Now researchers have devised a technique for seeing this particular RNA editing process in real time—the corrected strand gives off a green glow—and even for the restoration of functionality. "We can take a mutant version of a gene and restore its function," Brown University's Robert Reenan explained in a prepared statement. The findings were described online Sunday in the journal Nature Methods (Scientific American is part of Nature Publishing Group).


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Reenan and colleagues produced fruit flies that included an altered version of the gene for the oft-used lab tool green fluorescent protein. The protein product of their genetic construct would not glow—until it was first repaired by ADAR. "We're actually repairing RNA at the level of a single informational bit, or nucleotide," Reenan said.

By following the green glow, the team was able to track the patterns of ADAR in the fruit flies' brains in vivo. "We designed the molecular reporter to give us a fluorescent readout from living organisms," Reenan said.

Because the technique actually repairs an error and restores a function, it suggests promise for gene therapy-based treatments—but at the RNA rather than DNA level. Such treatment would target transcription mistakes, which may contribute to diseases such as epilepsy, schizophrenia and suicidal depression.

Reenan and colleagues have previously described connections between ADAR function and a fruit fly model for Fragile X mental retardation, caused by a mutation on the X chromosome. If the new tool can expose correlations between ADAR activity and disease states, it could reveal the role of RNA editing errors in the genesis of those syndromes.

Future research will reveal whether the green glow technique gets a green light to help researchers study—and maybe even treat—gene-related neurological diseases in humans.

Steve Mirsky contributed to this story.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe