Health Care Needs (More) Reform: Cancer Drugs Show How Markets Remain out of Whack

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


The market for at least one class of vital drug seems to have gone haywire. Certain types of generic cancer drugs are really hard to find. In August, of the 34 generic cancer drugs available to patients, there were 14 that could only be found with great difficulty. "If you are a pediatric oncologist, you know how to cure 70 to 80 percent of patients. But without these drugs you are out of business," wrote oncologist Ezekiel J. Emanuel last month in The New York Times.

While all of this is happening at the low end, the upper reaches of the market are just as crazy. One of the much-heralded drug approvals in recent years was a "cancer vaccine"—a drug to treat prostate cancer—that commands $93,000 and buys an average of four months for patients at an advanced stage of the disease. The problem with this treatment, called Provenge, is that there just aren't enough buyers. Doctors have to front the money before getting reimbursed. They're not getting paid back quickly enough, and so they are avoiding the drug. In the last week, in fact, the drug's maker, Dendreon, laid off a quarter of its workforce because physicians are not buying.

There's something wrong with this picture. Maybe relatively effective generic drugs should bear a higher price tag, and a drug regimen that costs as much as a small house in some parts of the country should be more affordable. In this case, the market seems to be sending a message that the current approach is unworkable. Unfortunately, the get-the-government-out-of-my-face ethos won’t solve it either.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Source: Wikimedia Commons

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe