How Quickly Would Measles Spread if Too Few People Were Vaccinated?

This simulation models what 80 percent vaccination rates of school-age children would look like vs. 95 percent

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


What would actually happen if only 80 percent of school-age children were vaccinated against the measles? It's a scary thought that a new simulation from the University of Pittsburgh aims to visualize.

On the Framework for Reconstructing Epidemiological Dynamics, or FRED for short, users can select a state and a city to see how two very different scenarios would play out over 238 days. The first example from FRED, below, shows what would happen in Manhattan if 80 percent of school-age children were vaccinated. The second example shows the result if the borough had 95 percent vaccination coverage.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The first map shows a devastating outbreak because the city has lost its herd immunity, which occurs when too few people are vaccinated to protect the community. On the second map a few measles cases pop up, but the population ultimately stays protected because enough people are vaccinated.

Unfortunately, the average vaccination coverage for one-year-olds across the U.S. was 91 percent in 2013. In 10 states--Arkansas, Colorado, Idaho, Iowa, Kansas, Maine, North Dakota, Pennsylvania, Vermont and Washington--coverage for children in kindergarten was below 92 percent during the 2013-14 school year, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

One of the drivers behind the current measles outbreaks is the increasing number of parents seeking vaccine exemptions for their children. From the beginning of this year through Feb. 27, 170 cases were reported to the CDC, largely stemming from the outbreak at Disneyland. Last year had the highest number of reported cases (644) since 2000. During the 2013-14 school year, 10 states had more than 4 percent of kindergartners with vaccine exemptions (Alaska, Arizona, Colorado, Idaho, Maine, Michigan, Oregon, Utah, Vermont and Wisconsin). The map below shows vaccination coverage and exemptions by state.

Explore simulations of other cities experiencing measles outbreaks on FRED here (it works best in Google Chrome and Safari browsers).

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe