How to Prepare for a Hurricane in the U.S. Northeast

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


It's not that the central and northern portions of the east coast of North America never see hurricanes. It's just that we in the Northeast don't see them that often. The last one was in 1999, and the last bad one was in 1938, a deadly one that caused damage that can still be seen in the form of missing barrier islands and reshaped coastlines.

That means many of us on the Eastern seaboard are wildly unprepared for the main threats of a hurricane: high winds, torrential rains and / or a storm surge from the sea. And Hurricane Irene, forecast to be at least a Category 2 storm and already unusually large, is now lumbering toward us, gathering strength from warm ocean waters, at 21 kilometers per hour.

Hurricanes are powerful tropical cyclones, capable at their worst of winds in excess of 250 kilometers per hour and a storm surge of more than five meters. At Category 2 Irene would only boast winds less than 110 kph and a storm surge of roughly 2 meters—still more than enough to swamp crowded coastlines (as you can see with this NOAA overlay map).


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


So how to survive such a storm? Here are some tips from the Federal Emergency Management Administration and my own local government: make sure drains and gutters are clear, put together a disaster supply kit (batteries and water are key) and secure loose objects likely to fly around in heavy wind like, I don't know, lawn furniture. FEMA even has flood maps for many localities, and New York City has prepared its own version [pdf].

There's a lot of us living in the areas likely to be inundated (including myself, since I reside in Gowanus, a low-lying patch of ground around a canal that is one of the nation's newest Superfund sites). It could be worse. We could be New York's Metropolitan Transit Authority, which has to pump water out of the subways—even on days when it isn't raining.

Of course, all this hoopla may not matter. Irene could weaken or get pushed out to sea. But—as with climate change—it's better to be safe than sorry. Or, take a lesson from the Boy Scouts: be prepared.

Images: Courtesy of NASA and NOAA

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe