Information Is Everywhere, How Can Science Protect It?

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Editor's Note: The following blog post first appeared May 15 on the World Science Festival's Web site

Underscoring the importance of encryption in our increasingly data-driven digital lives, this year's World Science Festival features its first-ever session on cryptography, entitled "Keeping Secrets: Cryptography in a Connected World." During this discussion expect a well-rounded panel—including mathematician and computer scientist Brian Snow, scientist/journalist Simon Singh, cryptoanalyst Orr Dunkelman and cryptography researcher Tal Rabin—to break down cryptography, addressing its strengths and weaknesses as well as its impact on security and privacy.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


At its heart, modern cryptography is all about mathematical algorithms, computer programming and physics, but there's a practical side to the discussion as well, particularly when you consider the nature of the data that's being encoded and decoded.

The debate over when, why and how to keep secrets—while certainly not new—has taken on a new sense of urgency in the current age of digital information. Just about every piece of vital information about us is stored somewhere on computers, and those computers often have connections to the Internet, forming the so-called "cloud" we keep hearing about. This means our personal information—credit card, bank account and Social Security numbers, Web browsing habits and online accounts (not to mention the passwords used to access those accounts)—is vulnerable for poaching and posting for all to see.

We can employ a number of tactics to guard our privacy—changing passwords regularly, using common sense about the personal information we volunteer and keeping vigilant watch over our smart phones, laptops and other connected mobile gadgets. Of course, none of these guarantees that our secrets are completely safe, especially when someone with the will and skill to steal digital data really wants it.

Just ask Sony, which recently admitted that hackers had breached its PlayStation Network and stolen customer information (including possibly credit card numbers). The company was quick to point out that some of the customer data taken was encrypted and that encryption levels would be "enhanced" moving forward.

If encryption works so well, why isn't all data encrypted? First of all, encryption is not infallible. Think of it as a puzzle that someone must solve in order to decode a message. If puzzle isn't very well thought out, there are computer programs that can easily decipher an encrypted message. Also, encryption requires extra time, money and effort on the backend by the people storing your personal information (aka the people in the cloud). They've got to add software and hardware to manage encrypted data as well as the keys needed to encode and decode this scrambled info, so they usually pick and choose what they want to encrypt. (Sony, for example, says it encrypted credit card numbers but not personal information on its PlayStation Network.)

Any cyber security expert will tell you that the best way to protect data is to create a layered defense. When it comes to securing online info (whether it's for keeping secrets or protecting privacy) there is no layer more important than the ancient art of cryptography.

Image courtesy of Amanda Rohde, via iStockPhoto.com

Larry Greenemeier is the associate editor of technology for Scientific American, covering a variety of tech-related topics, including biotech, computers, military tech, nanotech and robots.

More by Larry Greenemeier

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe