Jaws did not dominate early oceans

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Deep in the Silurian seas, some 420 million years ago, a strange structure had just emerged in the bodies of many new vertebrates. Some fish began developing a defined upper and lower jaw that allowed them to devour large and hard-shelled organisms.

Today more than 99 percent of vertebrates have these handy eating apparati. But new research shows that for all of their utility, mandibles did not take over the oceans in one swift chomp, as many scientists had previously assumed. Rather, the early, jawed fish didn't make too much of a dent in their jawless compatriots' success for some 30 million years. The new findings were published online July 6 in Nature (Scientific American is part of Nature Publishing Group).


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


And "when the jawless fishes do decline, we see no indication that their jawed cousins took up new functional roles," Philip Anderson, of the University of Bristol's School of Earth Sciences and co-author of the new study, said in a prepared statement. That finding has theoretical implications that reach far beyond the layers of Silurian sediment. It calls "into question old ideas of ecological replacement," that as a niche opens up, other species will fill it, he noted.

After analyzing fossilized Silurian and Devonian mandibles from 198 genera for different functional traits, the researchers also found that the emergence of this revolutionary mechanism did not set off a wild spree of evolutionary experimentation in design. Instead, after an initial bump of diversification—and a few exceptional mandibles in extinct placoderms and lungfishes—the major groups of jawed creatures whose descendents persist today, such as the ray-finned fishes and early tetrapods, seemed to stay relatively uniform. And all of this stability persisted despite "fluctuating global temperatures, shifting continental weathering patterns, sea level changes and a major extinction event," the researchers noted in the new paper.

Image of early fish jaw fossils, which show more diversity in lineages that later went extinct than in those that produced many of today's fish and terrestrial vertebrates (bottom two); courtesy of Simon Powell/Philip Anderson/Matt Friedman

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe