Jurassic Mammal Moves Back Marsupial Divergence

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


A newly described pointy-nosed, rat-like animal did not just crawl out of some unsuspecting city's sewers. Rather, this now-extinct species spent its time scampering among prehistoric trees some 160 million years ago during China's Jurassic period. Its modern appearance might seem unremarkable, but its advanced anatomical features—both internal and external—are exactly what have drawn the attention of scientists.

Juramaia sinensis was a small (15- to 17-gram) insect-eater that likely used its short legs to climb trees in search of food and shelter. Unearthed in the Liaoning Province, much of its skeleton was found fossilized along with all of its teeth, part of its skull and even some hairs.

It also had a strange reproductive strategy—at least for that era. Instead of laying eggs (like a "monotreme" relative the platypus) or carrying tiny young to term in a pouch (like a "metatherian," a marsupial, such as a kangaroo), it was a "eutherian," which means that it bore full-term live young like most of today's mammals do, thanks to a nutrient-rich placenta.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


This find "establishes a much older geological time for the split of the metatherian-marsupial and the eutherian-placental lineages than previously shown by the fossil record," by a good 35 million years, the researchers report in their paper, which was published online August 24 in Nature (Scientific American is part of Nature Publishing Group).

"Understanding the beginning point of placentals is a crucial issue in the study of all mammalian evolution," Zhe-Xi Luo, of the Carnegie Museum of Natural History in Pittsburgh and co-author of the new paper, said in a prepared statement. The establishment of when our early mammal ancestors first gained key capabilities, such as the placenta to nourish developing offspring, helps researchers obtain a better sense of the mammalian evolutionary timeframe—and its pacing. The new findings align closer to previous estimates that had been made using a DNA-based "molecular clock" model to arrive at divergence times than those based on an earlier find—the 125-million-year-old Eomaia.

Although the exact evolutionary path from the early eutherian mammals has yet to be traced, Luo noted that "Juramaia, from 160 million years ago, is either a great-great-aunt or a great-grandmother of all placental mammals that are thriving today."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe