Kabul Embassy Was Beefed Up after 1998 Bombings in Kenya and Tanzania

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


The U.S. embassy in Kabul, Afghanistan, the headquarters of NATO's International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) Afghanistan, and other buildings in Kabul are under attack today by insurgents with guns and rocket-propelled grenades. No personnel from either the embassy or ISAF have been reported hurt, but four police officers and two civilians were killed in the fighting, according to the Associated Press.

The U.S. diplomatic post in Kabul has a long history of turbulence and violence, but the embassy now benefits from a number of security improvements implemented in the wake of the 1998 terrorist bombings at U.S. embassies in Nairobi, Kenya, and Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Those attacks, which killed more than 220 and wounded some 4,000 people, were a wake-up call to the U.S. Department of State, as detailed in my recent article on pre-9/11 security breaches and the technologies and protocols deployed in response:

The U.S. Department of State found that 85 percent of its diplomatic sites were vulnerable to attack and implemented a slew of stronger safety precautions. New regulations required embassies to be set back 30 meters from roadways, inside a perimeter fenced off with anti-climb walls and anti-ram barriers. The new rules also called for blast-resistant construction materials and windows. The U.S. had spent more than $5.9 billion building new embassies and upgrading existing facilities by 2007.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Kabul was one of several posts to receive a new compound rather than mere upgrades to existing facilities. In fact, the U.S. embassy in Kabul had long been closed when terrorists attacked in Nairobi and Dar es Salaam; the U.S. had shuttered it in 1989 amid fears of a security breakdown as the Soviet Union withdrew from Afghanistan, and the embassy did not officially reopen until 2002. The Afghan capital has a history of diplomatic bloodshed: in 1979 Adolph Dubs, the U.S. ambassador to Afghanistan, was kidnapped by militants and killed in an exchange of gunfire. And suicide bombings at the Indian embassy there in 2008 and 2009 killed approximately 75 people and wounded hundreds.

The State Department seems to have taken more seriously the realities of diplomatic work in Kabul. By 2006, when the new compound had been completed, a Government Accountability Office report counted its cost at $177.2 million, more than twice as much as any other new embassy.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe