Leif Robinson, 1939-2011: A pioneer of astronomy journalism

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


I got the news today that one of the great figures in astronomy journalism and amateur astronomy, Leif Robinson, former editor of Sky & Telescope magazine, died yesterday at 71.

Leif served as editor in chief of S&T from 1980 to 2000 and was a regular fixture at gatherings of professional and amateur astronomers alike. He was always up to something interesting. I'll never forget being introduced to him at an American Astronomical Society meeting in Tucson in 1995. He was bleary-eyed because he had just driven four hours out into the desert in the middle of the night to see a rare bird, then driven back four hours. Outside the meeting hall, he waded into a crowd of protesters who were picketing against the building of an observatory on Mount Graham (which they said was a sacred native site) to try to come to some meeting of the minds.

Leif was a huge support to me early in my science-writing career, particularly when, as editor of Mercury magazine, a small astronomy magazine based in San Francisco, I did a number of special issues asking tough questions about, for example, the future of astronomy. After I moved to Scientific American, Leif planned on writing an article for us on the way that amateur astronomers have contributed to professional research—a project that I quietly shelved when his wife, Caroline, died. Both of them are missed.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Photo courtesy of Sky & Telescope

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe