Massive Planets Might Escape Stellar Engulfment Largely Undiminished

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Having your planet swallowed by a star is no fun. But some planets might be able to run the astrophysical gauntlet and make it through more or less intact.

When a star comparable to or somewhat larger than the sun enters advanced age, it swells up into a red giant, expanding far beyond its original radius. In the process, the star’s ballooning atmosphere will consume any nearby planets—such is the fate awaiting the planets of the inner solar system, Earth most likely included.

Mercury, Venus and Earth are all too small to endure engulfment, and will quickly spiral in toward the sun due to drag forces from the surrounding stellar atmosphere. Larger planets or substellar objects called brown dwarfs, however, can actually dispel the star’s bloated exterior and survive. But they may emerge somewhat worse for wear. The density of a star’s expanded atmosphere can strip away the outer layers of an orbiting planet, so what comes out may be very different from what went in.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


A new study by Jean-Claude Passy of the American Museum of Natural History in New York City and the University of Victoria in British Columbia and his colleagues in the Astrophysical Journal Letters seeks to uncover what a handful of engulfment survivors may have looked like before their close encounter with a star.

In recent years astronomers have found several planets or brown dwarfs in close orbits around aged stars that should already have passed through their swollen phase. Some of the planetary and brown dwarf survivors, unsurprisingly, are giants—one weighs 55 times as much as Jupiter. But some are considerably smaller—the two planets discovered last year orbiting the former red giant star KIC 05807616 are each less massive than Earth.

The researchers concluded that the modest-size planets orbiting KIC 05807616 must have undergone severe changes during engulfment by their star. These planets, Passy and his colleagues estimate, are remnants of a much larger world—or worlds—a few times the mass of Jupiter. In other words, the progenitor planet was hundreds of times as massive as the survivor.

The larger planets and brown dwarfs known to circle other evolved stars were a different story altogether. Those objects probably escaped engulfment more or less unscathed, the new study found. One caveat: Passy and his colleagues did not consider the effects of planetary evaporation under the star’s heat. The researchers note that evaporation could help diminish planets during stellar engulfment but report that the efficiency of the process is not yet well understood.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe