Medicine goes mobile: iPhone apps take vitals, track viruses

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


On tiny keypads and greasy touch screens, doctors, nurses, NPs and physicians assistants these days are doing a lot more than checking email and phone messages. Increasingly, health care workers are using their iPhones and other smart phones to track patient information, take vital statistics and even make clinical decisions.

Just months after the first iPhone was released, technology message boards were abuzz with discussions about how to use the new-fangled phone for medical purposes. Many professionals were anxious to start tapping away on popular programs such as Epocrates, an application that had already been around for nearly a decade via the Web and PDAs to help doctors track patient data and treatments. Today, according to the company's Web site, about one in three U.S. physicians are using the programs on mobile devices and online. And some 1,500 other medical apps for doctors and other health care workers have followed suit. (Eager iPad-owning MDs might have to wait a bit, however, as a recent review from iMedicalApps.com noted that although the new device fits in the pockets of most white lab coats, few medical apps have been optimized for the new format.)

But apps for the pros are only part of the story. The medical app marketplace extends to sick patients—and the worried well. People suffering from asthma or diabetes can download applications to track their symptoms and treatments, with AsthmaMD and Islet, respectively. Hypochondriacs can keep tabs on disease outbreaks with the HealthMap app. Patients enrolled in speech therapy at the Hollins Communications Research Institute can get an app to help them stop stuttering. And those with prescriptions for medical marijuana can even pinpoint any nearby (legal) dispensaries with the Cannabis app.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Now, go download two apps and text your doctor (or patients) in the morning.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe