Medicine goes mobile: iPhone apps take vitals, track viruses

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


On tiny keypads and greasy touch screens, doctors, nurses, NPs and physicians assistants these days are doing a lot more than checking email and phone messages. Increasingly, health care workers are using their iPhones and other smart phones to track patient information, take vital statistics and even make clinical decisions.

Just months after the first iPhone was released, technology message boards were abuzz with discussions about how to use the new-fangled phone for medical purposes. Many professionals were anxious to start tapping away on popular programs such as Epocrates, an application that had already been around for nearly a decade via the Web and PDAs to help doctors track patient data and treatments. Today, according to the company's Web site, about one in three U.S. physicians are using the programs on mobile devices and online. And some 1,500 other medical apps for doctors and other health care workers have followed suit. (Eager iPad-owning MDs might have to wait a bit, however, as a recent review from iMedicalApps.com noted that although the new device fits in the pockets of most white lab coats, few medical apps have been optimized for the new format.)

But apps for the pros are only part of the story. The medical app marketplace extends to sick patients—and the worried well. People suffering from asthma or diabetes can download applications to track their symptoms and treatments, with AsthmaMD and Islet, respectively. Hypochondriacs can keep tabs on disease outbreaks with the HealthMap app. Patients enrolled in speech therapy at the Hollins Communications Research Institute can get an app to help them stop stuttering. And those with prescriptions for medical marijuana can even pinpoint any nearby (legal) dispensaries with the Cannabis app.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Now, go download two apps and text your doctor (or patients) in the morning.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe