Microsoft Windows 7 has arrived...to mixed reviews

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


As Microsoft unleashes Windows 7 on the world Thursday, the consensus among those who have already taken the new operating system out for a spin is that while it's no PC panacea, at least it's not a repeat of the mistakes Microsoft made with Vista, which was launched in January 2007.

InfoWorld has characterized Windows 7's much-heralded support for multi-touch capabilities (which allow users to manipulate some objects on their monitor using their fingers) as a "disappointment" and "underwhelming" in different articles while pointing out that the new task bar located at the bottom of the main screen is something Mac OS X has offered for years. 


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The capacity to operate a PC using a touch screen—a feature that both Windows 7 and Mac OS X Snow Leopard offer—is a hit-or-miss proposition. While it's certainly useful if you're browsing the Web or otherwise engaging the interface for only a few minutes at a time, InfoWorld makes the point that users will not likely want to use the touch capability while working for hours at a time. Setting aside the need to keep one's arm extended and elevated when touching the PC screen, InfoWorldnotes, "the finger rarely makes a better mouse than a mouse." This could turn out to be an interesting dilemma for the PC industry in the near term, particularly because many of the biggest PC makers, including HP with TouchSmart and Dell with Studio One, have introduced lineups of touch-enabled PCs.

The New York Timesis more optimistic about Windows 7, pointing out that even though upgrading from much-beloved Windows XP to the new operating system isn't easy, Microsoft has kept "what's good about Windows Vista, like security, stability and generous eye candy, and addresses much of what people disliked," such as Vista's sluggish responsiveness, slavish demand for PC memory, and persistent, alarmist popup boxes.

Regardless of whether Windows 7 is an immediate success, CNET.comreports that the new operating system puts Microsoft on the right track after the Vista detour: "Windows 7 is more than what Vista should have been, it's where Microsoft needed to go." Success with its newest iteration of Windows is particularly important to Microsoft as Apple continues to pick up steam as a PC (and operating system) maker and IBM pushes an open-source Linux-based PC operating system, created in conjunction with Canonical Ltd., called IBM Client for Smart Work.

Image ©iStockphoto.com/ Sawayasu Tsuji

Larry Greenemeier is the associate editor of technology for Scientific American, covering a variety of tech-related topics, including biotech, computers, military tech, nanotech and robots.

More by Larry Greenemeier

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe