More evidence piles up that the moon harbors lots of ice

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Chandrayaan 1, the first moon mission launched by the Indian Space Research Organization, did not last long—in August 2009, controllers lost contact with the probe 10 months into its two-year mission. But the data Chandrayaan gathered while orbiting the moon continues to inform lunar science, especially in the realm of identifying potential stores of water on the moon.

Research to be presented (pdf) Thursday at the Lunar and Planetary Science Conference being held this week in the Woodlands, Tex., shows that a NASA radar on the Indian probe added to a growing dossier of evidence that the moon harbors large quantities of water. Paul Spudis of the Lunar and Planetary Institute and his colleagues say that Chandrayaan's Mini-SAR radar spotted what appears to be ice in dozens of north polar craters.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The research by Spudis and his colleagues follows the November announcement that NASA's Lunar Crater Observation and Sensing Satellite (LCROSS) had churned up about 100 kilograms of water during its impact into a crater near the lunar south pole. (Some of the moon's polar craters are permanently shadowed, a feature that has long made them appealing targets for finding trapped ice.) Less than two months before that, a consortium of researchers used data from Chandrayaan and two other spacecraft to show that molecular water is dispersed across the lunar surface in low concentrations.

According to a NASA press release, the Mini-SAR readings picked up waterlike signals from 40 craters [circled in green in map above], together harboring what could be 600 million metric tons of ice—a massive supply that could facilitate extended human visits to the moon. The radar bounces circularly polarized radio waves off the moon's surface to probe its composition; dry soil tends to reverse the polarization, from left-handed to right-handed, whereas ice tends to bounce back the waves with their polarization preserved.

Also at this week's Lunar and Planetary Science Conference, a pair of planetary scientists threw a bit of cold water, so to speak, on the recent ice research. Everett Gibson of NASA and Colin Pillinger of the Open University in England presented an assessment (pdf) of the available evidence for lunar water Tuesday, concluding that caution must be taken in interpreting the LCROSS data. The spacecraft's polar impact had no control experiment, Gibson and Pillinger note—what if the signals attributed to ice were also seen in presumably dry equatorial soils? Although plenty of circumstantial evidence for lunar water deposits exists, the researchers maintain that conclusive proof awaits a specially equipped lander—for instance, the Beagle moon lander Gibson and Pillinger have proposed in the past.

Image credit: NASA

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe