Moss Sperm Smells Sweet Enough for Sex

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Moss, that cushy, moisture-loving ground cover, is more promiscuous than we thought. These plants might not have the sexy flowers of a peony, but according to new research, they do manage to attract small pollinators with a subtle sweet smell.

Previously, scientists had presumed that these primitive plants needed a layer of water for their sexual reproduction. Moss sperm have two tails and can swim quite well. This strategy, however, would mean a dispersal distance of about 10 centimeters tops—and would have given new meaning to the term "dry spell," leaving female parts unpollinated without proper precipitation.

The new research, however, shows that the mosses, including Ceratodon purpureus (also known as ceratodon moss, fire moss or purple horned moss) and Bryum argenteum (silvergreen bryum moss) also use small insects called springtails (Foisomia candida) to spread their sperm. The mosses give off a slight odor, enticing the insects to crawl over them and pick up sperm, according to the findings, which were published online July 18 in Nature (Scientific American is part of Nature Publishing Group).


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The researchers, led by Todd Rosenstiel, of Portland State University's biology department, analyzed the volatile organic compounds expelled by sexually mature male and female moss plants and found that many of these chemicals were the same ones found in flowering plants. The male and female's scents differed, and the female plant had a stronger, more enticing scent

But are these little bugs just a back up plan, in case of dry weather? The research team constructed various moss environments, giving some more or less water and more or fewer springtails. Even with plenty of water for sperm to swim through, the presence of springtails greatly increased the pollination rates.

This sexual reproduction strategy is actually quite remarkable, considering that the mosses and the microarthropods that apparently help pollinate them emerged as some of the first co-occurring forms of life on land. (The free-swimming sperm that can take advantage of a water layer are thought to be a holdover from their ancestors' aquatic days.) So, these ancient organisms might have helped lay the foundation for the flashy flowers and pollinators that we have today. Next time you stop and smell the roses, don’t forget to pay a little thanks to the humble moss.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe