NASA may delay final space shuttle launch until 2011

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


The final planned space shuttle mission, currently slated for mid-November at the earliest, may not lift off until February 2011, according to a NASA spokesperson.

Only two launches remain before the shuttle program's planned phaseout; the next launch, the STS-133 mission of space shuttle Discovery, is currently scheduled for September 16. But a delay in payload hardware for Discovery's mission may force a postponement of STS-133 to October 29, says public affairs officer Michael Curie of NASA Headquarters in Washington, D.C.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


That would in turn push back the successive and final shuttle launch, the STS-134 mission of space shuttle Endeavour, to February 28, 2011. Many observers had predicted that weather or technical delays, which are relatively common, would force just such a revision of the tightly packed launch calendar.

NASA has been flying missions at a rapid clip as the space agency seeks to complete its share of construction of the International Space Station and retire the shuttles. The past six shuttle flights have been to the space station, and both remaining missions are station runs as well.

Curie says that the space shuttle program is reviewing the issue and that a final decision will be made July 1. "The shuttle program is funded through the first quarter of [fiscal year] 2011 to fly missions, and there is no issue with moving STS-134 into February," he adds.

Photo of a space shuttle on the launch pad at Kennedy Space Center in Florida: NASA/KSC

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe