NASA's Ares 1-X test rocket lifts off successfully

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


A prototype NASA rocket for a planned crew launcher lifted off into the Florida sky Wednesday morning, providing an unmanned flight demonstration of the new technology. The 100-meter-tall Ares 1-X, powered by a solid rocket booster, flew from Kennedy Space Center to an altitude of 45 kilometers before splashing down six minutes later in the Atlantic Ocean as planned.

The exercise tested components for Ares 1, a rocket that should begin ferrying astronauts to orbit in the next decade—assuming, of course, that NASA continues to pursue Ares 1 rather than shifting crew-launch duties to private space companies. The latter option is a distinct possibility given the recent report of a blue-ribbon panel chaired by former aerospace executive Norman Augustine. The Augustine commission determined that under NASA's budgetary constraints, Ares 1 can only be completed at the expense of other high-profile projects, such as the International Space Station.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


An earlier launch opportunity Tuesday was foiled by inclement weather, and conditions were again less than ideal Wednesday, but mission managers found a suitable opportunity at 11:30 A.M. (Eastern Daylight Time), toward the end of the four-hour launch window for Ares 1-X.

Among the concerns in both launch attempts was triboelectrification—static electricity generated by friction, in this case friction between clouds and a rocket piercing through them at supersonic speeds. Such static buildup could disrupt on-board electronic activity. With the Ares 1-X launch being largely focused on data collection and testing, even a temporary loss of instrumentation or communications could be costly.

Mission managers watching Wednesday's test launch: NASA/Bill Ingalls

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe