Neuroscience meeting: Researchers take a step toward a bionic eye

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


SAN DIEGO—Tens upon tens of thousands of people in the U.S. use cochlear implants, a bionic ear-like device that can restore hearing to the profoundly hearing impaired. Biomedical technologists have labored for decades to create the visual equivalent, a working prosthesis to restore sight to those with damaged retinas. Thus far, these efforts have met with limited success.

Here at this week’s Society for Neuroscience annual meeting, Sheila Nirenberg of Weill Cornell Medical College presented a novel approach that appears to improve on previous labors by fashioning a device that mimics the brain's innate software. The prosthesis replaces retinal circuits by processing light received and then outputting a code—technically, action potentials—that are relayed internally to the processing centers in the brain that construct a conscious image.

Previous technology produced simpler images, Nirenberg said at a press briefing. (The pictures above show natural vision on the left, an old-style artificial retinal image on the right and different stages of processing Nirenberg's coded images in the two middle pictures.) Nirenberg and her student, Chethan Pandarinath, hail from the neural coding field, which brings a new way of approaching the problem. The standard focus has been on improving prosthetics by increasing the number of electrical nerve stimulators that are placed in the patient's retina. Nirenberg's group has been focusing on how to turn the stimulators on and off in the right pattern, so that the retina sends normal signals to the brain. Their device mimics the retina's software to replicate the signalling used to produce an image in the brain.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The team built a device to calculate the requisite code from the light pattern captured from an eye-tethered camera that is part of the prosthesis. The encoder replicates a portion of the retinal circuitry and was able to produce images in blind mice that had a fidelity that approached that of an actual eye. “There was enough information in the system’s output to construct images, of faces, animals, scenes of Central Park, basically anything we attempted, she said.  

 

Image Credit: Sheila Nirenberg

 

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe