New policy raises the profile of DNA evidence in federal crime cases

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Federal law enforcement and prosecutors have received a mandate from the U.S. Department of Justice to use DNA identification whenever possible in investigating and prosecuting federal crimes. The move makes good on U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder's promise a year ago to use the power of DNA to exonerate the innocent as well as convict the guilty and is a reversal of a Bush administration policy that effectively induced some federal criminals to waive their right to DNA testing.

Holder issued two memoranda on Thursday. One memo directs federal prosecutors to seek DNA testing waivers from defendants and convicted criminals only "under exceptional circumstance" while the other memo outlines for federal prosecution offices and Department of Justice investigative agencies the requirement to collect DNA samples from federal arrestees and defendants.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Holder's mandates follow a yearlong review of the government's 2004 policy to get federal suspects to waive their right to DNA testing as a condition of pleading guilty. The review was initiated when the Justice Department realized the policy has been implemented inconsistently throughout the federal government. "Existing policy is too rigid to accommodate the facts presented by individual cases and does not promote careful consideration of whether a waiver is appropriate to the case at hand," according to Holder's memo.

Innocent people sometimes plead guilty to crimes because losing at trial would result in a harsher penalty, says attorney Peter Neufeld, co-director of the Innocence Project, an organization he founded in 1992 with Barry Scheck to assist prisoners who could be proven innocent through DNA testing (both lawyers were part of the O.J. Simpson defense team).

Under the Justice Department's previous policy, people who pled guilty forfeited their right to exonerate themselves at a later date using DNA evidence, a situation Neufeld characterizes as "mean-spirited." Whereas the Innocence Project has exonerated 261 people in the U.S. thus far, only one was a federal prisoner. Neufeld, however, stops short of predicting how much the change in DNA testing will impact the exoneration of additional federal prisoners.

DNA image courtesy of Richard Wheeler, via Wikimedia Commons

Larry Greenemeier is the associate editor of technology for Scientific American, covering a variety of tech-related topics, including biotech, computers, military tech, nanotech and robots.

More by Larry Greenemeier

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe