Town Hall: Obama and Romney Talked about Science (a Little)

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


If you blinked you missed the fact that President Barack Obama and Governor Mitt Romney dealt with a few science issues in the Town Hall debate this week at Hofstra University. So, for a change of pace from our ongoing weekly look at one of ScienceDebate.org's 14 questions about the "Top American Science Questions," I've pulled together some quick summaries by our staff to highlight specific differences in science-grounded policies between the candidates.

 

Of course, an entire live debate devoted to the scientific foundations of proposed presidential policies would have been ideal – particularly since it would have allowed for follow-up questions. And that was ScienceDebate.org's original goal. But at least some science is peeking through all the rehearsed replies and talking points.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


 

Education

The second presidential debate started with a question about education and jobs for the future. Read what the candidates said about investing in science and math education and how Scientific American graded their responses (scroll down):

Energy

On Tuesday evening Governor Romney said, “I'll get America and North America energy independent. I'll do it by more drilling, more permits and licenses.”

 

Here's the follow-up question that should have been asked: Is energy independence feasible?

 

Judge the differences in the candidates' responses on energy policy and how Scientific Americangraded their answers--including the feasibility of energy independence.

 

Immigration

When asked about immigration issues at the town hall debate, Governor Romney said, “I also think that we should give visas to people — green cards, rather, to people who graduate with skills that we need. People around the world with accredited degrees in science and math get a green card stapled to their diploma, come to the U.S. of A.”

 

Read more about how Governor Romney would change immigration policies to ensure the U.S. remains a leader in innovation and how Scientific Americangraded Romney's and President Obama's responses to the innovation issue.

Innovation

Fielding a question at the second presidential debate about generating new jobs for the next generation, President Obama said, “I want high wage, high skill jobs. That's why we have to emphasize manufacturing. That's why we have to invest in advanced manufacturing. That's why we've got to make sure that we've got the best science and research in the world.”

 

Both Obama and Romney provided written answers on 14 science questions – read their responses on innovation and science research and the future and how Scientific American graded there responses here and here (scroll down).

Read the candidates’ answers to all 14 questions in full at either ScienceDebate.org or ScientificAmerican.com. Election 2012 button used under Creative Commons license BY 2.0.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe