Obama stops in Michigan's Upper Peninsula to push his National Wireless Initiative

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


President Obama spent some time on Michigan's Upper Peninsula on Thursday to promote his administration's National Wireless Initiative, a project first mentioned in last month's State of the Union address to make available high-speed wireless services to at least 98 percent of U.S. residents. The president's speech at Northern Michigan University in Marquette revealed few new details about the initiative; in fact much of the information was presented at a White House briefing in late June. The event was more an opportunity for him to promote a plan through which the government hopes to raise $27.8 billion over the next decade via the sale of wireless spectrum space, with about one-third of those proceeds going to help pay down the national debt.

Obama opened his remarks by assuring those listening that his administration is watching the most recent developments in Egypt—as rumors ran rampant about President Hosni Mubarak's possible resignation. Obama tied his comments about Egypt's very public "moment of transformation" to the impact that broadband Internet connections and wireless technology are having on society, saying, "As we watch we are reminded that we live in an interconnected world." The president wants to deliver that interconnected world to a larger portion of this country, noting that only 65 percent of U.S. households have a high-speed Internet connection. A few studies from last year put that number at 75 percent or greater.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Beyond simply enabling broadband, the National Wireless Initiative proposes a $10.7 billion investment to benefit first responders, including $3.2 billion to reallocate and reserve a band of spectrum that would be prioritized for public safety use rather than being auctioned off for commercial use. This investment also includes $7 billion to support the deployment of the network and $500 million from a wireless innovation fund for R&D and technological development to tailor the network to meet public safety requirements. The initiative also calls for a $5 billion investment to implement 4G wireless networks in rural areas.

The president hopes to free up 500 MHz of spectrum in the next decade (much of it within the next five years) that can be used by the rapidly expanding number of smart phones and laptops vying for wireless Internet connectivity. The National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) has identified 115 MHz of federal spectrum thus far that can be freed up for exclusive or shared use and is evaluating another 95 MHz of spectrum to see if that can likewise be made available for non-governmental uses.

Image courtesy of Alberto Pomares, via iStockphot.com

Larry Greenemeier is the associate editor of technology for Scientific American, covering a variety of tech-related topics, including biotech, computers, military tech, nanotech and robots.

More by Larry Greenemeier

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe