Obama Takes Aim at Climate Change, Cyber Security

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


After a campaign that avoided climate change like the plague, President Barack Obama gave a State of the Union speech that put climate change on center stage. Early in the speech he encouraged law makers to revisit cap-and-trade as a way of tackling emissions of greenhouse gases.

"I urge this Congress to pursue a bipartisan, market-based solution to climate change, like the one John McCain and Joe Lieberman worked on together a few years ago," Obama said. The Climate Stewardship bill would have set a cap of carbon emissions at 2000 levels, but failed in Congress before Obama took office.

Climate change was something of a disaster for Obama in his first term. In 2009, while three senators were trying to negotiate Republican support for cap and trade legislation, Obama undermined their efforts by announcing his support for offshore drilling, effectively giving away a key bargaining chip (the New Yorker's Ryan Lizza wrote a now-classic story on the snafu).


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Obama peppered his State of the Union speech with references to several big science and technology issues. He called attention to the threat of cyber warfare and the need to protect the nation's infrastructure from cyber attacks. Obama singled out the power grid, financial networks and air traffic control as being vulnerable to sabotage. Earlier in the day he signed an executive order to increase information sharing and set security standards, but on the podium he called on Congress to pass legislation "to give our government a greater capacity to secure our networks and deter attacks."

Obama went out of his way several times to make jobs and national competitiveness into issues of science policy. He announced his intention to start high-tech manufacturing projects modeled on past government support of 3D printing to ensure that “the next revolution in manufacturing is made right here in America.” He also cast clean energy technologies in terms of a race with China for future high-tech industries: “As long as countries like China keep going all-in on clean energy, so must we." And he coached his proposal for an Energy Security Trust to encourage the development of renewable fuels for cars in terms of protecting citizens from rising gas prices.

Even Obama's call to repair the nation's aging infrastructure sounded like a grab-bag of sci-tech measures--it took in the power grid, Internet access, high-tech schools and bridges that have fallen into disrepair. At a time when jobs are scarce and economic growth is still sluggish, Obama emphasized long-term fixes in which science plays a big role.

Fred Guterl is the executive editor of Scientific American and author of The Fate of the Species (Bloomsbury). Guterl is former deputy editor of Newsweek. His writing and editing have contributed to numerous awards and nominations from the American Society of Magazine Editors. His article "Riddles in the Sand," in Discover, was named best magazine article in 1998 by the American Association for the Advancement of Science, and his Newsweek article "The Wasteland," on Russia's plan to accept the world's nuclear waste, was honored by the Overseas Press Club for environmental writing.

More by Fred Guterl

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe