Off the grid: a high-tech military deployed the ancient art of stealth to capture their man

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


They could have used grappling hooks and longbows.

The hunting down of global enemy number one came about through the type of detective work and on-the-ground stealth military activity that might have been considered ingenious, oh, among 15th-century ninja warriors or the ancient Sumerians. Ian Fleming would not have had a lot of raw material to work with here.

The real story on all of this will likely emerge in the next few hours or days, so everything written here may be moot from the time of posting. But it seems like what happened was that a bunch of intelligence types sat around a table and pieced out where exactly Osama bin Laden could be.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


They decided that he couldn't be in a cave or in the Pakistani frontier territories because that's exactly where everybody thought he would be. So there were probably only two other places in the world he could be holed up: somewhere else in Pakistan or in Somalia. Afghanistan probably would have been okay, too, except there were just too many cops.

So, if, in the most likely case, he was still in Pakistan, he would probably be hiding ostentatiously in plain sight. And that's when old-fashioned shoe leather and detective work came into play. Why was an obviously non-affluent Pakistani man going to and from that complex with the insanely high walls just a few miles from the capital city of Islamabad?

The whole affair turned into a game of low-tech one-ups-manship. The compound itself reportedly had no phone or Internet service. The place was off-the-grid, even if it was only a few miles from military facilities.

It's true: At the point that intelligence agents began to trail Bin Laden's courier, drones and satellites probably were probably trained on the Abbottabad complex. But these were really just high-tech security cameras, and could have, if necessary, been replaced with Galileo-era-vintage spyglasses. The whole operation, from beginning to end, was a masterpiece of Humint, the type of human intelligence that the U.S. was criticized for lacking immediately after 9/11. (Let's not go overboard: The killing of two Pakistanis by a CIA contractor in January shows how things can still go terribly awry.)

Still, the U.S. capability has matured in the intervening years. Human smarts were even brought to bear in the decision to dispose of the body at sea in a traditional Muslim ritual. You can see the same intelligence types sitting around the table. Should we keep the body? If we don't, will anyone believe that it's him? And then, the immediate response: Screw the "birther" types; if we leave the impression that we're prying and poking at the body as it were an alien's, the "street" will explode. The past 10 years has been an intensive instruction course in cultures most Americans hardly knew existed, an immersion that is just now beginning to pay off.

 Image: Flickr/marsmet51

 

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe