Parachute failure before splashdown left Ares 1-X booster badly dinged

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


NASA's launch of the Ares 1-X test rocket Wednesday was a success—but, as it turns out, a qualified one. The rocket's first booster stage, which splashed down in the ocean as planned six minutes after launch, was found to be significantly dented when divers reached the mammoth cylinder to prep it for retrieval.

Ares 1-X mission manager Bob Ess told reporters Friday that parachute malfunction was the culprit in the damage, according to Universe Today. The failure of one of the booster's three main parachutes, as well as possible collateral damage to another chute, resulted in a hard landing in the water, Ess explained.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


But Ess downplayed the significance of the glitch. The people responsible for the parachutes "are not worried about it," he said. "This is all part of doing a test flight, so the team is still very elated."

But Spaceflight Now notes that the "test of the new parachute system was one of several major objectives of the Ares 1-X test flight." The planned Ares 1 crew-launch rocket, for which Ares 1-X is a test vehicle, will be more difficult to ease back to Earth for recovery than, say, comparatively lightweight space shuttle boosters. "The full-scale parachute system used for [Ares 1-X's] first flight test was designed to handle the heavier weight of the Ares 1 and its fall from a higher altitude," Spaceflight Now explains.

Photo credit: NASA

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe