Predicting small-scale turbulent flows could lead to more efficient airliners and ships

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


It is a phenomenon that has eluded description for centuries. Today's supercomputers are not up to the task of simulating it in detail. And the great physicist Richard Feynman reportedly called it "the most important unsolved problem of classical physics."

What grand conundrum could possibly cause such trouble? The answer is surprisingly mundane: turbulent fluid flows. When a solid object passes through air or water, the interface becomes a chaotic region of almost innumerable fluctuations and eddies as the surrounding medium passes over and around the solid object.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


It is those chaotic flows and the drag they generate that account for up to half of the jet fuel burned during an airplane flight, and an even higher share of fuel usage on large ships and submarines, according to a study in the July 9 issue of Science. But modeling such complex behavior in realistic detail is a task far too daunting for today's technology.

The effects of turbulence near a surface, whether the body of an airplane or the side of a ship, are difficult to predict, the study's authors explain. "The most important processes occur very close to the solid boundary—the region where accurate measurements and simulations are most challenging," report Ivan Marusic, Romain Mathis and Nick Hutchins of the department of mechanical engineering at the University of Melbourne in Australia.

The Australian group has produced a new model that predicts some properties of such fine-grained "near-wall" turbulence from large-scale effects measured farther away from the surface. The outer layers of fluid flow, the authors found, have a twofold impact on the near-wall turbulence: the outer turbulent "superstructures" both deliver energy to the wall region and modulate the scale of the fluctuations there. The new model, which incorporates those effects, was found to match well with results from a simplified experimental setting with a 27-meter flat surface in a wind tunnel.

In an accompanying commentary in Science,Ronald Adrian of Arizona State University notes that further work will be needed to verify that the model works for all interfaces, not just the simplified wind-tunnel surface, and that it can predict the full complexity of turbulence. If models such as that developed by the Australian team could bring Feynman's great problem one step closer to being solved, engineers might be able to better account for its effects by designing surfaces that experience less drag. "The ability to predict such behavior," the study's authors write, "often implies opportunity for control."

Photo: © iStockphoto/sculpies

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe