Retinal implant to restore partial sight approved for use in Europe

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


After decades of development and years of clinical trials, an optical prosthesis capable of restoring at least partial vision to those suffering from retina-damaging diseases will hit the market. Second Sight Medical Products, Inc., said Wednesday that its Argus II Retinal Prosthesis System has been approved for sale throughout most of Europe. Sylmar, Calif.–based Second Sight is planning to apply for U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval this year.

The retina lines the back of the eye's inner surface and records images in patterns of light and color. The Argus II implant actually relies on a mini camera mounted on a pair of sunglasses to capture an image and send the information to a video processor, worn on the belt along with a wireless microprocessor and battery pack. After the video processor converts the images to an electronic signal, a transmitter on the glasses sends that information wirelessly to the receiver implanted under the eyeball's clear mucus membrane, called the conjunctiva.  The receiver in turn conveys the signals through a tiny cable to an electrode array placed on the retina. The array directly stimulates the cells that lead to the optic nerve.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


On receiving the pulses, the brain perceives patterns of light and dark spots corresponding to the electrodes stimulated. Patients learn to interpret the visual patterns produced into meaningful images.

Second Sight received the go ahead to make the Argus II available based on a successful clinical trial with 30 blind patients worldwide. The retinal implant will first be available later this year at Centre Hospitalier National d'Ophthalmologie des Quinze-Vingts in Paris, Geneva's Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève, England's Manchester Royal Eye Hospital and Moorfields Eye Hospital in London. It costs $100,000 per implant, although the company also says it is trying to have all or part of the cost subsidized in some countries.

Other retinal prostheses are expected to follow, in particular a subretinal device from Germany's Retina Implant, AG, that places the implant under the surface of the retina to stimulate bipolar cells. Three previously blind patients suffering from retinitis pigmentosa and other ocular diseases were fitted with the company's retinal implants and have been able to locate bright objects on a dark table, a team of researchers led by Eberhart Zrenner, the company's co-founder and director and chairman of the University of Tübingen's Institute for Ophthalmic Research in Germany, reported recently in Proceedings of the Royal Society B. One of the patients was able to correctly describe and name objects like a fork or knife on a table, geometric patterns, different kinds of fruit and discern shades of grey with only 15 per cent contrast.

Images courtesy of Second Sight Medical Products, Inc.

Larry Greenemeier is the associate editor of technology for Scientific American, covering a variety of tech-related topics, including biotech, computers, military tech, nanotech and robots.

More by Larry Greenemeier

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe