Second human embryonic stem cell trial cleared by FDA

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


An embryonic stem cell treatment for a rare inherited form of blindness was approved Monday for clinical trials. This is only the second human embryonic stem cell-based trial to be approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)—the first started last month with a Geron Corp. trial that is assessing the use of such cells to treat spinal cord injuries.

The latest trials will examine the effectiveness of embryonic stem cells to treat Stargardt's macular dystrophy, which causes the death of photoreceptor cells in the retinal pigment epithelium, often in early adolescence. Some 30,000 to 50,000 people in the U.S. have the disease, for which there is currently no treatment, according to the American Macular Degeneration Foundation.

Advanced Cell Technology, the company that developed the experimental therapy, says it will enroll 12 adults in the phase I/II clinical trial (which tests the methods and doses for safety) and expects to start the research in early 2011. Tests in animals showed that injecting stem cell-derived retinal pigment epithelium cells into the eyes of afflicted rats allowed the animals to regain some of their lost sight.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


"It is exciting—a vindication," Robert Lanza, Advanced Cell Technology's chief medical officer, told Reuters. "All this work really came through," he said, acknowledging that the company had recently been through some difficult financial times.

Federal funding for human embryonic stem cell research remains in question as an appeals court prepares to hear oral arguments early next month about an injunction issued this summer. Meanwhile proponents of the research hope for a legislative move to clarify the current regulations.

"After a decade of intense controversy, the field is finally ready to prove itself," Lanza told The Washington Post. "It also shows the new readiness of the FDA to work with researchers to move exciting new stem cell therapies out of the laboratory and into the clinic."

Photograph by Phineas H., courtesy Flickr

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe