Self-Cannibalization and Computer Graphics Win 2012 Kyoto Prizes

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


The Inamori Foundation announced this year’s Kyoto Prizes today. Dr. Yoshinori Ohsumi won the prize in Basic Science, and Dr. Ivan Edward Sutherland won the prize in Advanced Technology.

Ohsumi, a professor at the Frontier Research Center of the Tokyo Institute of Technology, won for his pioneering work on autophagy. From the Greek for “self-eating,” autophagy is a process by which cells break down and recycle their own proteins. Cells do this for a variety of reasons: to remove harmful bacteria, as a response to starvation, and to repair damaged cell components. Scientists now believe that reduced autophagy is involved in aging and neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzhieimer’s. Ohsumi was the first scientist to observe autophagy in yeast, and he subsequently identified several genes necessary for autophagy.

Sutherland, a visiting scientist at Portland State University, was awarded the prize for his work on computer graphics, visual simulations, computer aided design (CAD), computer modeling, and virtual reality. His 1963 computer program Sketchpad is the predecessor of many modern graphics-based applications. With Sketchpad, users created graphics with a light pen and could then manipulate lengths and angles in their designs. It demonstrated that human-computer interaction could be used for both technical and artistic purposes. Sutherland’s work on the timing of computer circuits was the subject of an article in Scientific American in July 2002.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The Inamori foundation created the Kyoto Prize in 1985 “to honor those who have contributed significantly to the scientific, cultural, and spiritual betterment of mankind.” Ohsumi, Sutherland, and the philosophy and arts winner Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak will each receive a diploma, a medal, and 50 million yen (approximately $630,000) at a ceremony in Kyoto in November.

Last year the Kyoto prize in Basic Science went to astrophysicist Rashid Sunyaev of the Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics and the Advanced Technology prize to materials scientist John W. Cahn.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe