Shocked Physicist Learns His Big Bang Theory Is True [Video]

Few people were as thrilled with the big physics news today as physicist Andrei Linde. One of the main authors of inflation theory--the idea that the universe expanded incredibly rapidly just after it was born in the big bang--Linde has reason to be excited.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Few people were as thrilled with the big physics news today as physicist Andrei Linde. One of the main authors of inflation theory—the idea that the universe expanded incredibly rapidly just after it was born in the big bang—Linde has reason to be excited. Physicists announced this morning that they have discovered imprints of gravitational waves in the cosmic microwave background light pervading the sky—a finding that many are calling “direct evidence” of inflation theory.

Chao-Lin Kuo, an assistant professor of physics at Stanford University and a co-leader of the Background Imaging of Cosmic Extragalactic Polarization 2 (BICEP2) team behind the finding, knocked on Linde’s door to deliver the news personally. Kuo tells an accompanying cameraperson, “He has no idea that I’m coming.”

Linde and his wife Renata Kallosh, both professors of physics at Stanford, look flummoxed when they answer the door. “I have a surprise for you,” Kuo says. “It’s 5 sigma, at .2.” Linde and Kallosh are taken aback; she comes forward to hug Kuo as Linde says, “What?” The ensuing reactions of both as they process the news are completely endearing—all the more so because Kuo’s arcane pronouncement could elicit such joy only from the few people in the world who would immediately know what he meant.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


5 sigma” refers to the statistical significance of BICEP2’s discovery. Kuo was telling Linde and Kallosh that his experiment had seen a very strong signal. “Sigma” denotes standard deviations, and a discovery with a statistical significance of 5 sigma has only about a one-in-3.5-million chance of being a fluke.

The second part of Kuo’s message, “.2,” refers to the value BICEP2 had measured for a parameter called r, which indicates the ratio of the fluctuations in the CMB caused by gravitational waves to the fluctuations caused by perturbations in the density of matter. Previous experiments such as the European Planck satellite had suggested r might have a value of less than 0.11, so the measurement of 0.20 is noteworthy.

The idea of inflation first came from physicist Alan Guth in 1980. Linde was one of the early theorists who helped refine the theory and has proposed versions of inflation in which our universe is one of many inflationary universes in a vast multiverse.

The findings announced today validate many of Linde’s ideas and make a pretty solid case for inflation being the true history of our universe. As Linde says, “Let’s just hope that it is not a trick.”

Clara Moskowitz is chief of reporters at Scientific American, where she covers astronomy, space, physics and mathematics. She has been at Scientific American for more than a decade; previously she worked at Space.com. Moskowitz has reported live from rocket launches, space shuttle liftoffs and landings, suborbital spaceflight training, mountaintop observatories, and more. She has a bachelor’s degree in astronomy and physics from Wesleyan University and a graduate degree in science communication from the University of California, Santa Cruz.

More by Clara Moskowitz

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe