Sick-clop: Ponies with the flu show how virus out-mutates vaccines

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Despite millions of needle jabs to bolster flu immunity each year, the efficient influenza virus continues to evolve to get around these biological blockades by altering its surface proteins. As people in a population become immune to the virus through vaccination or exposure, however, they change how the virus mutates and, ultimately, the chances of a larger outbreak.

But precisely how do small changes in the virus and a group's immunity impact the risk of an influenza epidemic?


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Because human populations have a wide history and variable rate of immunization, researchers have had a difficult time predicting how an influenza strain will change in response to a vaccinated population. "We do not know how changes in viral [surface proteins] translate into immune escape," wrote the authors of a new paper on the topic. So to study the question, researchers turned instead to ponies.

Like people, some horses have been being vaccinated against the flu (H3N8 in their case, H3N2 in ours) for decades. And, as the equine flu has many similar characteristics to seasonal influenza A, groups of ponies provided a useful controlled experiment to track the virus behavior. 

One group of ponies received vaccination against a common flu strain while another did not. By analyzing the data both the microscopic level (the molecular changes in the flu virus) and the macroscopic level (the infection patterns in the herds), the researchers were able to track the dynamics of the illness's spread. The results were published online Thursday in Science.

A virus with just two or more key differences in amino acids on its surface protein hemagglutinin (the "H" in formal flu designations) made the ponies more susceptible. And once the virus had changed enough to appear novel to the body's immune system, larger outbreaks were more likely.

The researchers also found that even if pandemic vaccines are not a perfect match for circulating virus strains, vaccinating a large portion of the population can create enough immunity to slow the spread and even prevent a larger outbreak.

Through further study, "public health officials will be able to assess the usefulness of a vaccine based upon its relationship to the current influenza strain and the population's immunity level," Andrew Park, an assistant professor at the University of Georgia's Odum School of Ecology and College of Veterinary Medicine and lead study author, said in a prepared statement. 

Honing in on the characteristics of flu mutations and outbreaks is not only important for the current H1N1 pandemic, but also for the annual seasonal flu, which kills an average of about 36,000 people in the U.S. each year. As the authors note, even the H3N2 strain mutates enough during the course of every two to five years that the new iterations may not longer be recognizable to a previously exposed immune system. 

Beyond fighting the flu, findings could also help to combat "a broad class of infections, including emerging, reemerging and extant infectious disease," the paper authors wrote.

Image of ponies from the study courtesy of Science/AAAS

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe