Slum-Dog Marketing Introduces the Janitor as Consumer Role Model

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Chrysler recruited Eminem to plug its 200 Sedan during the Super Bowl. George Clooney has shilled Martini vermouth. “Influentials,” as they are known by consumer marketers, have been around since way before Ronald Reagan was doing spots for GE in the 1950s.

The marketing of high-tech gadgetry and a few other selected products, however, can apparently invert the rationale of exploiting star cred to rub off on a Lexus or a Suntory bottle. A new line of research shows that you don’t need as many Twitter followers as Lady Gaga to sell smart phones. In fact, the best way to hawk some high-tech items might be to craft a marketing campaign that plays on insecurities generated by a chance encounter with the super while taking garbage to the basement (on the butler’s day off).

The reason that affluent consumers might head up the low-brow marketing staircase is rooted in the psychology of "keeping up with the janitor." When the smart-phone recalcitrant (like me) sees the guy at the Halal stand on the corner with an iPhone, the technophobe (or cheapskate, like me—better stick with the image of hedge fund managers) will observe the belt-holstered gadget on the falafel man, only to experience an insecure desperation to shop that will prompt that individual to cross against the light to get to the Verizon Wireless store across the street as quickly as possible.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


A study recently published online in The Journal of Consumer Research found marketing from the bottom up works in some but not all cases. Vicki Morwitz of New York University, and Edith Shalev of the Technicon Israel Institute of Technology acknowledged in their article the existence of a new form of social influence process called Comparison-Driven Self Evaluation and Restoration, which apparently also works for $200 T-shirts. If you want to sound academic: “Influence via comparison-driven self evaluation and restoration (CDSER) takes place when one observes a counter-stereotypical product user, and as a result questions one’s relative standing on the trait that the product symbolizes.”

In other words, "me out-of-touch prosperous klutz, me need iPhone.”

But CEO Tim Cook probably won’t introduce "The Security Guard Communicator" at next year’s Apple product roundup. Even Steve Jobs would have had difficulty with the ad campaign. Morwitz and Shalev contend that this type of pitch may work best once a product has already become firmly established, opening the possibility of marketing to well-to-do buyers who are trying to play consumer catch-up. As Occupy Wall Street emphasizes, the 99 percent still have a lot to offer.

Image source: Wikimedia Commons

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe