Soil May Help Pathogens Make Us Sick

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Tetracycline—a powerful antibiotic—came from the soil. Researchers isolated the drug, used to treat everything from sexually transmitted diseases to bacterial pneumonia, from the soil-dwelling microbe Septomyces aureofaciens, which produces tetracycline to kill its microbe neighbors. So it comes as no surprise that other soil microbes have evolved ways to resist this antibiotic

But a new genetic analysis has revealed that soil microbes and clinical pathogens—the kinds of microbes that make people sick—have been swapping the genes necessary to resist humanity's arsenal of antibiotics. According to research published in Science on August 31, scientists found that identical genes that confer resistance to a suite of 12 different antibiotics are found in both U.S. soil microbes and pathogens from around the globe.

Eighteen of the resistance genes found in sick people in every inhabited continent directly match genes found in soil microbes from Massachusetts, Minnesota and Pennsylvania. This identical match, including even the parts that play no known biological role, suggests that soil microbes and the microbes that cause sickness have been swapping genes recently, not developing such resistance on their own, though it's unclear which way the genes flowed.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


As part of their analysis, the researchers detected 110 different genes that could confer resistance to one or more of the nine major classes of antibiotics. (More than half of these genes had never been identified before.)

The soil microbes are not only evolving resistance to the antibiotics naturally present in their environment, they seem to be developing ways to protect themselves from man-made antibiotics ranging from ciprofloxacin to penicillins. That evolutionary process has likely been speeded along by the widespread use of various antibiotics in farming.

How exactly the genes are getting from soil microbes to sickness microbes or vice versa remains unclear. One suggestion is that soil microbes and pathogens mingle in the human gut, swapping genes that allow both to prosper. It is also likely that microbes are evolving antibiotic resistance in other environments contaminated with excess antibiotics, such as rivers, lakes, streams and even the seas.

But, just as over-reliance on antibiotics has helped foster microbial resistance, microbial over-reliance on the same set of genes may prove a fatal flaw, if new antibiotics or treatments can be found. The place to start may be in the dirt.

Image: © iStockphoto.com / Jon Helgason

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe