SpaceX completes successful first test launch of Falcon 9 rocket

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Private access to space took a giant leap forward Friday with a successful test launch of the Falcon 9 rocket, developed and built by SpaceX, a venture headed by PayPal co-founder Elon Musk.

The two-stage Falcon 9, which stands about 48 meters tall*, lifted off from a Cape Canaveral launchpad at 2:45 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time carrying a dummy capsule that could soon deliver supplies to the International Space Station—and, one day, even astronauts to orbit. Less than 10 minutes after launch, according to the SpaceX live Webcast, the rocket's upper-stage engine shut down, having delivered its payload safely to Earth orbit.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Despite myriad delays in executing the test, including a false start at the launch pad Friday, success in the inaugural launch of the Falcon 9 marks a major achievement for SpaceX. The company's smaller Falcon 1 rocket took four launches to achieve its first full success.

Hopes are especially high for SpaceX in light of President Obama's budget request, released in February, for fiscal year 2011. Obama's plan for NASA calls for terminating the space agency's own line of Ares rockets, which had been intended to boost astronauts and cargo into space, and contracting with private operators to provide those launch services instead.

In 2008 NASA announced that it had selected SpaceX as one of the providers of resupply missions to the space station through 2016. At the time, the space agency said it had ordered 12 flights from SpaceX at an estimated cost of about $1.6 billion. According to a SpaceX launch manifest, the first Falcon 9 resupply mission to the International Space Station will not launch before 2011.

The Falcon 9 is powered by SpaceX's Merlin engine, which runs on liquid oxygen and kerosene rocket fuel. The Falcon 9's first stage boasts nine Merlin engines to lift the more than 300-metric-ton rocket off the ground. After nearly three minutes of flight the first stage separates and falls away as a single Merlin engine takes over to power the upper stage to orbit.

Image credits of first stage flight [top] and second stage after separation [bottom]: SpaceX

*Correction (6/18/2010): The height of the rocket was originally identified as 55 meters, which is the planned height of the operational Falcon 9 with a satellite enclosure. The test rocket launched June 4 was 48 meters tall.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe