Strange Supernovae are Driven by Magnetic Fields [Video]

Three animations model how strongly magnetized stars produce oddball stellar explosions

Philipp Mösta and Sherwood Richers of the California Institute of Technology

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Not all supernova explosions are created equal. Scientists have recently discovered an amazing diversity of stellar deaths with a far broader variety of characteristics than they had previously supposed existed. Some supernovae, for example, are overachievers that detonate with the brightness of 100 ordinary blasts; others are underwhelming, fizzling out with hardly a flash. This strange supernova zoo is becoming clearer thanks to automated telescope surveys that can scan the entire sky on a regular basis, turning up far greater numbers of stellar eruptions than astronomers were ever able to study before.

Astronomer Daniel Kasen of the University of California, Berkeley, details some of these peculiar recent discoveries in the feature “Stellar Fireworks,” appearing in the June 2016 issue of Scientific American. To give the blasts a visual twist, he has shared some computer simulations that he and his colleagues created to model what occurs inside a class of oddball supernovae born from rapidly spinning, highly magnetized neutron stars called magnetars.

 


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


This animation shows the shock wave that results when the core of a rapidly rotating, strongly magnetized massive star collapses to form a neutron star. Funnels of highly magnetized plasma launched from the baby neutron star spread the shock front outward asymmetrically. Gases of different temperatures are depicted  in different colors—blue corresponds to the coldest gas, green is hotter, and yellow and red are the hottest.

 

In this simulation researchers show how different processes drive the evolution of a magnetic supernova. Blue and red colors represent material that is strongly influenced by dynamics in the gas itself, whereas yellow indicates gas that is driven by magnetic fields. Instability in the magnetic fields causes this highly magnetized material to twist and bend.

 

This animation portrays the magnetic fields of a collapsed massive star. Yellow and red represent positive magnetic fields, and blue represents negative magnetic fields. On a timescale of just 10 milliseconds, the star’s rapid rotation revs up the strength of its magnetic field to a million billion times that of our sun.

Videos by Philipp Mösta and Sherwood Richers of the California Institute of Technology

Clara Moskowitz is chief of reporters at Scientific American, where she covers astronomy, space, physics and mathematics. She has been at Scientific American for more than a decade; previously she worked at Space.com. Moskowitz has reported live from rocket launches, space shuttle liftoffs and landings, suborbital spaceflight training, mountaintop observatories, and more. She has a bachelor’s degree in astronomy and physics from Wesleyan University and a graduate degree in science communication from the University of California, Santa Cruz.

More by Clara Moskowitz

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe