Talking Science and the Google Science Fair [Video]

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


"We need to teach our kids that it’s not just the winner of the Super Bowl who deserves to be celebrated,” said President Obama in his recent State of the Union address, “but the winner of the science fair.”

The first Google Science Fair, for which Scientific American is a partner, will do just that. More important, simply doing a science-fair project is a great way to explore questions about the world around us. (For more on the role of questions, watch my opening remarks at the launch event held on January 11.) Finding the answers on your own is called "inquiry-based learning." Many studies, starting in the late 1960s, have shown this hands-on approach is an excellent complement for standard classroom work. But it’s also really fun.

In a science-fair project, you ask your own questions, figure out a way to find the answers by designing your own experiment, get the facts from your results—and then you become the expert authority on what you found. You’ll also get a better idea about what scientists really do. Believe me, it isn’t sitting around memorizing boring terms and statistics (as important as they are).


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


How do you get started? In this video, I got some advice from the nutrition scientist Marion Nestle , who, with me, is one of the judges for the Google Science Fair. Nestle is the Paulette Goddard Professor of Nutrition, Food Studies, and Public Health at New York University. She teaches courses at the university and also writes books and articles, blogs and tweets as @marionnestle. She has a PhD in molecular biology, but she came to love studying nutrition because it is so relevant to people’s lives.

As you'll see in the video, Nestle recommends to students to "follow your passion"—go where your curiosity leads and only take on things that you "really care about.” Don’t worry if someone else has studied some aspect of your topic area before. “Anything anybody is interested in probably hasn’t been studied to the extent that it should be,” she says. I love her story about how 13-year-olds working on a science-fair project found the same results—and a couple of years earlier—than scientists who used sophisticated brain scans. And I hope to see your entry in the Google Science Fair.

Mariette DiChristina, Steering Group chair, is dean and professor of the practice in journalism at the Boston University College of Communication. She was formerly editor in chief of Scientific American and executive vice president, Magazines, for Springer Nature.

More by Mariette DiChristina

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe