Tax "Reform" Could Harm Graduate Students, Delay Scientific Advancement

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Curious and full of optimism, aspiring scientists arrive at the University of Cincinnati Medical Center to take part in interviews, with the hopes of being admitted to the Neuroscience Graduate Program. These interviewees are asked a simple question: “Why do you want to pursue neuroscience research?” One person wants to discover a cure for Parkinson’s disease; another wants to uncover better treatment options for opioid addiction; others seek to further develop our understanding of how the brain works. While the answers vary, the underlying desire is the same: to improve the human condition through research and innovation.

Each year, thousands of students like these enter into research-intensive graduate programs to earn a PhD and become part of a highly educated work force that will make significant scientific advancements to treat our most devastating diseases. These programs, on average, take five and a half to six years to complete and are filled with demanding requirements. On top of maintaining a high grade point average, almost all graduate programs in the biomedical sciences require students to perform original research, publish findings and help teach classes.

In exchange for research, most graduate students receive a small stipend to supplement their income and a waiver that covers the cost of tuition. This tax-free tuition waiver prevents graduate students from undertaking repressive student loan debt, while providing incentive to recruit and retain junior researchers and teachers.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The H.R. 1 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act passed recently by the House would repeal a provision in the tax code that makes these tuition waivers tax free, greatly increasing the tax burden faced by many graduate students. Essentially, students would be taxed on money they never received in the first place.

The bill does propose a temporary increase to the individual standard deduction, but that is anticipated to be inadequate to cover the increase in taxable income graduate students would see, resulting in a dramatic reduction in livable income of current graduate students.

The House tax reform bill would also revoke students’ ability to deduct student loan interest from their taxes and repeal two tax credits for students. Removing these popular tax provisions will increase the cost of obtaining a college degree and undoubtedly deter students from pursuing an advanced degree. In the long run, the decrease in the availability of researchers and individuals with highly sought-after technical skills will stagnate our country’s scientific advancement and economic development.

The just-passed Senate tax reform bill does not eliminate these popular student tax benefits, so perhaps they will remain when the two versions are reconciled. However, both the Senate and House bills would introduce a new excise tax on endowments of private colleges and universities, which are critical tools for universities to support scholarships, academic programs and capital improvements. A new tax on universities, either private or public, will diminish their capacity to educate our society.

As the House and Senate come together to negotiate the differences in their bills and decide on the final tax reform legislation, it is imperative that they reject these provisions that would increase the cost of obtaining a degree, decrease our workforce of highly skilled workers and reduce our nation’s competitiveness internationally.

Please join me in contacting your members of Congress to ask them to oppose tax provisions that harm students and jeopardize scientific advancement and to instead enact legislation that spurs innovation and research as a means of fostering America’s economic development.

Ryan Makinson recently completed his PhD in neuroscience at the University of Cincinnati and is the graduate student trustee on the University of Cincinnati Board of Trustees.

 

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe