TEDMED 2010: Medicine tries some new ideas

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


SAN DIEGO—Not everything you try will work, but you need to try lots of ideas. That was advice here from Nathan Myhrvold, founder of Intellectual Ventures and former chief technology officer at Microsoft, on the opening evening of the TEDMED conference, held from October 27 through 29. Myhrvold and the other speakers offered plenty of ways to solve challenging problems.

For instance, he noted the tremendous number of infections in hospitals: 1.7 million cases per year. A device that beams ultraviolet light on surfaces can kill bacteria. In another challenge, Myhrvold said that 99.9 percent of X-ray energy is wasted, but backscattering, or reflecting, it back can make more use of that energy—and capture better images in the process.

Nathan Wolfe, a professor at Stanford University and director of the Global Viral Forecasting Initiative (and Scientific American scientist adviser), spoke of a different challenge: combating the onset of possible pandemics. Wolfe said that a suite of "interconnectivity" factors have led to a high risk because they have created opportunities for infection: viruses jumping species when prey (such as monkeys) are eaten by predators (such as chimps), past inoculation campaigns that used shared needles, blood transfusions, living in dense populations and mass worldwide transportation. "Perhaps the most important and critical event in human history [for virus transmission] is the development of mass transportation," Wolfe added.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


From a "virus's perspective," there's now a single human population, said Wolfe, whose global network effort is seeking to add novel types of data in the hunt for outbreaks. [See his 2009 article “How to Prevent the Next Pandemic.” and the story "PlagueBusters".] "Big data has an incredible capacity for public health,” he added. Among the possible sources are Google searches for words such as “fever," drug-purchase patterns, medical records—even Twitter activity.

The "E" in TED is for "entertainment," and soprano Charity Tilleman-Dick offered a mixture of beautiful songs and poignancy as she described her struggles with pulmonary hypertension, leading to a lung transplant a year before. Afterward, transplant surgeon Shaf Keschavjee, director of the Toronto Lung Transplant Program, wheeled onstage a machine that could improve transplant success by keeping lungs awaiting implant surgery at room temperature (instead of cold) and feeding them a nutritive solution. The machine had a living pair of healthily pink pig lungs, clearly expanding with air and then contracting. Keschavjee invited a few audience members to touch it. "It’s very soft," noted Tilleman-Dick.

 

 

 

Mariette DiChristina, Steering Group chair, is dean and professor of the practice in journalism at the Boston University College of Communication. She was formerly editor in chief of Scientific American and executive vice president, Magazines, for Springer Nature.

More by Mariette DiChristina

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe