The Best of the Quantum Shorts Film Festival

And the winner is … a tale about a parallel universe-hopping psychopath

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


If you want to understand quantum theory at a gut level, then look no further. For the past seven years the Quantum Shorts initiative from the Center for Quantum Technologies at the National University of Singapore elicited submissions from artists and writers from around the world. The challenge: Create a five-minute film or short story that explores quantum mechanics (the contest alternates between film and writing each year).

I had the opportunity to judge the Quantum Shorts film competition this year, watching plenty of films that explored quantum concepts. Some were whimsical and others were deep, but all of them were thought-provoking. You can see the 2018 short-listed films on the Quantum Shorts web site.

For 2018 the contest focused on film and drew more than 170 entries, with 10 finalists selected. Now, in partnership with Scientific American and Nature (as well as with several scientific institutions), Quantum Shorts 2018 revealed this year’s first- and second-place winners as selected by a six-member panel of expert judges as well as a “People’s Choice” winner selected via public online polling.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Each winning team gets a cash award ($1,500 for first place, $1,000 for second, and $500 for People’s Choice) a trophy and a one-year digital subscription to Scientific American, which is awarded to all finalists.

I loved the winning film, Slide! Thomas Tay Li Guo’s thriller about a parallel universe–hopping psychopath is so good I’d like to see a longer film. I won’t spoil the ending, but it will make you wonder:  How do you know the difference between This You and That You? How many versions of You could there be? It is possible that in a parallel universe, I actually will spoil the ending for you?

The runner up, If the World Spinned Backwards by Leonardo Martinelli and Arthur Valverde, imagines how different our lives would be if time were no longer a straight arrow always moving forward.

The People’s Choice award, decided by online public vote on the 10 shortlisted films, goes to Legio VIII Quantae, about “the quantum resurgence after the fall of Silicon Valley.” This faux documentary was filmed in the Spanish town of León by PhD student Andrea Rodríguez Blanco with friends and family. It imagines a new quantum based technological future.

LEGIO VIII QUANTAE. "The quantum resurgence after the fall of Silicon Valley" from Quantum Shorts on Vimeo.

The next call for Quantum Shorts entries will occur later this year. Continuing its annual alternation between film and flash fiction, 2019’s contest will be for short stories. Announcements will be available via the Quantum Shorts Twitter account and Facebook page.

Eliene Augenbraun is a multimedia science producer, formerly Nature Research's Multimedia Managing Editor and Scientific American's senior video producer. Before that, she founded and ran ScienCentral, an award-winning news service providing ABC and NBC with science news stories. She has a PhD in Biology.

More by Eliene Augenbraun

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe