The Genetics of Eating Disorders

New research bolsters the growing case that genes play a significant role

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Thirty million American women and men will struggle with eating disorders in their lifetime, and these life-threatening conditions have a higher mortality rate than any other psychiatric illness. For example, someone struggling with anorexia for five years has a 5 per cent, or one in 20 chance, of dying.

While more and more people have come to understand that eating disorders are diseases of the brain, there's still a widespread belief that people with these devastating conditions are vain, attention-seeking, or lacking in will power. But a paper just published in Plos One makes it clear that this isn't true. The study evaluated the genomes of 95 individuals with diagnosed eating disorders and identified 430 genes, clustered into two large groups, that are more likely to be damaged than in people without those disorders. 

This adds to a growing body of research shows that eating disorders are powerful, biologically-driven illnesses. The new study supports previous findings that the risk of developing an eating disorder is 50-80 per cent genetic—that patients have inherited damaged copies of genes that increase their risk of developing disordered eating. And understanding which genes are damaged can practitioners create better treatment treatment protocols.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


In the Plos One study, patients with eating disorders were clustered into two main groups. In the first, the damaged genes fell into a class of gut neuropeptides affecting that control appetite, food intake and digestion/absorption of nutrients, making patients more likely to binge. Roughly half of this group struggled with restricted eating patterns, and the other half were binge eaters. The research confirms reports by our patients who believe their behavior is biologically driven.

The second group of patients had a cluster of genes involved in the function of the immune system and inflammation, which has long been known to suppress appetite. Patients with damaging mutations in the inflammation cluster are much more likely to have restricted-eating patterns. More research is needed to test a possible connection between eating disorders and auto-immune conditions like irritable bowel disease.

The new findings are consistent with known environmental eating disorder triggers. Fad dieting, excessive exercise, or medical illness, are examples of negative energy states that have long been seen as possible eating disorder triggers. Negative energy states can set up behavioral changes like food binges or restricted food intake, triggering preexisting genetic drivers for eating disorders. Based on these findings, we argue that eating disorders are biologically driven illnesses that alter mood and behavior, similar to how the lack of thyroid hormone can result in depression in a patient with hypothyroidism.

Failure to understand the underlying causes of eating disorders creates stigma, making it less likely for those who struggle to get treatment. People with any medical condition deserve support and access to the best treatment. Someone with cancer wouldn’t be denied treatment for their illness. Likewise, patients with eating disorders shouldn’t feel guilty about their illness and they should have access to safe, effective treatment.

Biology isn’t destiny. Eating disorders treatment is most effective if it’s accompanied by a general understanding that eating illnesses are biologically driven.

Lasting recovery from an eating disorder is possible—and those who struggle deserve understanding and support without guilt or judgment.

Michael Lutter, MD, Ph.D. is a physician-scientist who treats eating disorders at the Eating Recovery Center in Dallas. His research on the genetic and neurological basis of eating disorders has contributed several major findings to eating disorder research.

More by Michael Lutter

Annetta Ramsay, a Ph.D. trained, licensed counselor and Internationally Certified Eating Disorders Specialist and an Op-Ed Thought Voices Fellow, treats eating disorders in Denton, Texas.

More by Annetta Ramsay

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe