The grandmother factor: Why do only humans and whales live long past menopause?

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American



On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Most mammals don't live long past their reproductive years, failing to serve much evolutionary purpose after they can stop passing on their genes to offspring.

Only three long-lived social mammalian species are known break that mold. Killer whales (Orcinus orca), pilot whales (Globicephala macrorhynchus) and humans (as well as possibly some other great apes) all have females that generally live for decades after they cease being able to bear young. So what might we have in common with these cetaceans?

A new study, published online June 30 in Proceedings of The Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, describes a strong link with specific social patterns that might predispose females to live beyond their fertile years.

"Whether it is younger or older individuals that are most likely to refrain from breeding and adopt the role of kin-selected helpers, depends on the pattern of dispersal and mating," the researchers concluded.

In species in which the males leave home to breed, over a female's lifetime, she is surrounded by an increasing number of males to which she is not related (as male offspring leave home and others die). Thus, this pattern increases her options for new mates and decreases the incentive for helping to provide for young that are not her own (or carry any of her genes), the researchers, Rufus Johnstone, of the Department of Zoology at the University of Cambridge, and Michael Cant, of the Center for Ecology and Conservation at the University of Exeter, noted in their paper.

For mammals in which the female leaves the group to mate—or in which breeding happens away from the group—a female will find herself surrounded by an increasing number of males to which she is related (as sons, grandsons and other generations of males stick around). In this scenario, it actually behooves her—and the group—to stop mating (and competing for breeding resources that could increase the fertility of younger females) and help younger females raise her progeny. Other research has shown that having a grandmother around to help out confers extra benefits on younger generations.

Although contemporary human societies have given rise to all kinds of moving and mating arrangements, the researchers point out that in traditional human forager societies, "female transfer to the husband's family at marriage is more common," and genetic analysis shows an extended human history of "female-biased transfer." For the two whale species, the researchers noted that both are thought to mate outside of their local groups, leading to "an increase in local relatedness with female age."

Johnstone and Cant explained that mating patterns are not likely the only factor to contribute to the evolution of menopause and a long post-reproductive life in these three species. But learning more about females' changing social groups helps to reveal "the underlying similarity between the ape and whale cases… which would otherwise be obscured by the differences in their social structure."

The jury is still out on whether these marine mammals also endure hot flashes.

Image courtesy of iStockphoto/Lazareva

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe