The International Space Station Is More Valuable Than Many People Realize

It’s crucial to our exploration of the solar system, but this marvel of innovation has not always had the support it deserves

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


In 1984 when President Reagan directed NASA to build a permanently occupied space station, no one could have predicted the critical role it would play in human space exploration nearly four decades later.

The International Space Station (ISS) took 12 years to build with support from 16 nations and has been populated continuously since November 2000. A colossal achievement by any measure—the station weighs a million pounds and is the single most expensive object ever built. And it should be.

Truly a jewel in the crown of human achievement, the ISS gave the U.S. and its partners an operational outpost in the most austere environment ever known.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Over its lifespan, more than 2,400 experiments have been conducted by more than 230 visitors from 18 countries. The station's crew have logged over 1,300 extravehicular activity (EVA) hours on more than 217 spacewalks. Over their lifetime, teenagers have seen a constant revolution in technology, some of it exclusively the result of space access and research.

But this marvel of innovation has not always had the support it deserves.

Since the high point of the Apollo program, NASA endured criticism for being too focused on sustaining the space shuttle at the expense of deep-space exploration. Not surprisingly, political support and funding atrophied as a result. Indeed, in 1993 the station came a mere one vote away from termination in the House of Representatives. 

And yet, while few were watching since the shuttle stood down in 2011, a new and reinvigorated agency is emerging with a vision that should captivate even the cynics. Under Space Policy Directive 1 (SPD-1), NASA and the ISS National Laboratory are accelerating the nation's push into commercial space. With an expected trillion-dollar space economy to come, the ISS can play a defining role in the formation of the industry.

Aboard the ISS, an array of basic and applied research programs are underway with participation of companies such as Boeing, Anheuser-Busch, Sanofi, LambdaVision, Space Tango, Airbus, and Teledyne Brown Engineering. The ISS is effectively the premier space R&D lab, and companies are utilizing microgravity at the edge of the human frontier 250 miles up to solve problems here on Earth.

Beyond the major policy shift announced in June to allow for greater commercial partnerships aboard ISS, other major milestones are underway. Last month, NASA and Boeing assembled 80 percent of the massive core stage needed to launch the Space Launch System and Orion on their first mission to the Moon: Artemis 1.

Notably, NASA's "new" charge to facilitate and encourage the commercial sector is nothing new. After all, NASA has fostered some of the greatest technological developments in all of human history. And later this year, NASA's Commercial Crew transport will launch from Cape Canaveral to resupply the ISS.

But no one should take for granted the colossal task of maintaining this orbital toehold. Despite being sheltered within our planet's magnetic shield, the ISS has endured a battering equivalent to an aircraft carrier in World War II's Battle of Midway. Shuttle veteran Alvin Drew recounted to the U.S. Chamber of Commerce a year ago his EVA experience with razor sharp ISS exterior surfaces because of the sandblasting effect of the low Earth orbit environment.

Just maintaining the operational status of the station alone is an achievement. Over the decades NASA and Boeing, as prime contractor, have stretched and maximized the platform as a test bed to fully evolve our understanding of microgravity's effect on metabolic systems. Humans are fragile after all. But SPD-1 boldly charts out human exploration to the Moon, Mars and beyond.

With ISS as its point of departure, NASA's recently announced Lunar Gateway program will be the platform to prepare and propel humans to Mars. To paraphrase Administrator James Bridenstine, Gateway will be the permanent lunar command module.

And in 2024 Gateway will facilitate the mission objective of Artemis 1 to land astronauts near the Lunar South Pole. But we can't get there from here—not without the ISS. The lion's share of onboard station research is aimed at solving long-term challenges for human survival in deep space. The ISS is the tethered ship from which astronauts will hone spacefaring skills to venture beyond the proverbial horizon.

In this new era of exploration, the ISS is allowing the right questions to be asked and answered. One could say that, to date, we have been consumed with identifying the limitations inherent in humanity's reach into space. Yet recently, we have begun to ask a more nuanced and intriguing question: What are the unique characteristics of the domain beyond Earth that we can use for our benefit?

Although the future of deep-space exploration is no more known today than it was in 1984, all that is certain is the ISS will be the launch pad for wherever humans go from here.

Christian Zur leads the U.S. Chamber of Commerce's policy formulation and advocacy on civilian and commercial space programs. His articles have been featured in publications including Aviation Week, Defense News, Orlando Sentinel, Scientific American, Space News, The Hill and The Seattle Times.

More by Christian Zur

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe