The Most Fascinating Human Evolution Discoveries of 2013

Wow. Ive just spent the last couple days going through the paleoanthropology news that broke in 2013 and I must say it was a banner year. There were so many exciting new findings that bear on scientists understanding of just about every chapter of humanitys seven-million-year sagafrom our ancestors first upright steps to the peopling [...]

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Wow. I’ve just spent the last couple days going through the paleoanthropology news that broke in 2013 and I must say it was a banner year. There were so many exciting new findings that bear on scientists’ understanding of just about every chapter of humanity’s seven-million-year saga—from our ancestors’ first upright steps to the peopling of the Americas. But don’t take my word for it. Check out the links below for highlights from our latest turn around the sun and see for yourself just how very far we have come.

  • Analysis of the shape of the braincase of seven-million-year-old Sahelanthropus tchadensis from Chad supports the claim that it is the oldest human ancestor on record.

  • The femur of Orrorin tugenensis, a putative human ancestor that lived six million years ago in Kenya, has a shape that is intermediate between that of fossil apes and early members of the human lineage—a finding that confirms previous claims that the creature walked upright.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


  • Tiny, rarely preserved middle-ear bones from two of our ancient relatives that lived millions of years ago exhibit modern features, which may indicate an early shift in hearing ability.

  • The latest round of studies of Australopithecus sediba, a nearly two-million-year-old relative of ours from South Africa, reveals a previously unknown form of upright walking and decidedly humanlike jaws and teeth. But is it the ancestor of our genus, Homo?Not so fast.

  • Spectacular skull from the site of Dmanisi in Georgia is the fifth skull to emerge from the site, which dates to 1.77 million years ago. The specimens are quite diverse in size and shape, yet they all come from the same time and place, and thus surely belong to the same species. The discovery team argues that the variation seen in this one group suggests that several early human species that scientists have named may in fact belong to a single, variable species. Not everyone agrees. Either way, some of the variation evident in the lower jaw bones from Dmanisi may be the result of overuse of toothpicks.

  • A hand bone dating to nearly 1.5 million years ago, probably from H. erectus, shows that a key feature related to the dexterity and strength necessary for making and wielding complex tools evolved half a million years earlier than previously thought.

  • Researchers unearthed a treasure trove of fossils belonging to an as-yet-unidentified human relative from a cave in South Africa’s Cradle of Humankind—and invited the world to follow the adventure as it unfolded (not the usual way of doing things in paleoanthropology, which is notoriously secretive).

  • DNA from a 400,000-year-old fossil from Spain—the oldest human DNA yet by a long shot—unexpectedly resembles DNA from the mysterious Denisovan people who lived in Siberia 80,000 years ago.

  • Stone-tipped javelins from Ethiopia date to more than 279,000 years ago, making them nearly 200,000 years older than the previous record holders. Experts thought that H. sapiens was the first species to invent composite projectiles, but the new finds pre-date the origin of our kind and thus must be the handiwork of another species. It’s one more wrinkle in the surprisingly complex story of the evolution of human creativity.

  • The first high-quality genome of a Neandertal—a female who lived in Siberia around 50,000 years ago--shows that her parents were as closely related as half siblings and that her recent ancestors mated with close relatives, too. Comparison of her genome with genomes of other extinct humans suggests that both Neandertals and an unknown human species interbred with the mysterious Denisovans from Siberia—yet more evidence of interspecies boot-knocking among our ancestors.

  • Additional wrist bones of the wee human “hobbits” that lived in Indonesia as recently as 17,000 years ago bolster the case for the remains representing a distinct species, H. floresiensis, and not diseased modern humans as critics have claimed. On a sad note, archaeologist Mike Morwood, co-discoverer of our little hobbit cousins, passed away.

 

Kate Wong is an award-winning science writer and senior editor for features at Scientific American, where she has focused on evolution, ecology, anthropology, archaeology, paleontology and animal behavior. She is fascinated by human origins, which she has covered for nearly 30 years. Recently she has become obsessed with birds. Her reporting has taken her to caves in France and Croatia that Neandertals once called home to the shores of Kenya’s Lake Turkana in search of the oldest stone tools in the world, as well as to Madagascar on an expedition to unearth ancient mammals and dinosaurs, the icy waters of Antarctica, where humpback whales feast on krill, and a “Big Day” race around the state of Connecticut to find as many bird species as possible in 24 hours. Wong is co-author, with Donald Johanson, of Lucy’s Legacy: The Quest for Human Origins. She holds a bachelor of science degree in biological anthropology and zoology from the University of Michigan. Follow her on Bluesky @katewong.bsky.social

More by Kate Wong

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe