The quest for cool: Novel approach leads to brighter, more efficient white LEDs

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


For phosphor-based light-emitting diodes (LEDs) to continue their current trend of displacing incandescent and fluorescent bulbs, makers of these small semiconductor-based lights are looking to, among other things, continue improvements in energy efficiency, increase longevity and reduce glare.

LEDs are illuminated by the movement of electrons in a semiconductor material, but the common practice of coating the semiconductor with phosphors to produce white light is an impediment to potential improvements. With most phosphors, more than half of the photons generated divert back toward the semiconductor substrate called the die, where much of the light is absorbed and lost, says Nadarajah Narendran, director of research at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute's Lighting Research Center (LRC) in Troy, N.Y.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The avoid these problems, researchers have for several years experimented with ways of separating the phosphor from the underlying energy source. Such a layered configuration allows light traveling back toward the die to instead escape through the sides, generating 30 to 60 percent more light output (measured in lumens) and luminous efficacy (lumens per watt of electricity) than typical white LEDs, says Narendran, also a professor in Rensselaer's School of Architecture, whose LRC research focus is LED performance, packaging and lighting application. "Phosphor is direction agnostic, so when you put the phosphor right on the chip, half the amount of light goes downward and half goes up," he adds.

In 2004, Narendran and his colleagues developed Scattered Photon Extraction (SPE), a method to improve the light output and efficacy of white LEDs by combining optimally shaped optics and placement of the phosphor away from the semiconductor die. "The two main benefits that we saw were the amount of light increased and the longevity of the light," he says.

Intematix, a Fremont, Calif.-based maker of LED phosphors, on Tuesday introduced an LED architecture called ChromaLit, which follows this remote-phosphor approach to produce what the company says is up to 30 percent higher system efficacy.

ChromaLit places a phosphor composite onto a separate substrate that emits white light when excited by a blue LED energy source. In separating the energy source from the light-generating phosphor, ChromaLit enables lighting system manufacturers to keep the phosphor performance stable over a lighting fixture's lifetime, says Intematix CEO Mark Swoboda. In addition, he adds, lighting manufacturers also have more design flexibility because Intematix's phosphors are turned from powder into pellets that can be injection-molded into different shapes or into inks that can be used to color plastic disks that cover the blue light source.

One of Intematix's goals is to have ChromaLit used to make more diffuse LEDs that are more practical for high-volume lighting applications found in the hospitality industry and the residential market. "People in these settings don't want to see hotspots or glare," says Swoboda, who adds that products based on ChromaLit should find their way to market by midyear.

Images of ChromaLit courtesy of Intematix; image of SPE courtesy of Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Lighting Research Center

Larry Greenemeier is the associate editor of technology for Scientific American, covering a variety of tech-related topics, including biotech, computers, military tech, nanotech and robots.

More by Larry Greenemeier

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe