The Real Truth about Hillary, UFOs and Area 51

Scientific American's Clara Moskowitz explains things to Chris Matthews on Hardball

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


The worlds of politics and media went into a tizzy earlier this week when the New York Times published an article titled "Hillary Clinton Gives U.F.O. Buffs Hope She Will Open the X-Files." Evidently, the Democratic presidential candidate has been asked a couple of times about whether she'd release classified documents about UFO sightings and the infamous and secret Area 51, in Nevada—the place conspiracy lore would have us believe that the government keeps extraterrestrial spacecraft, or alien cadavers, or some other smoking gun that would prove once and for all that The Truth Is Out There.

If you look at some of the actual interviews, it's clear that Secretary Clinton doesn't buy into any conspiracies. Sure, she's interested in knowing what people have actually seen (or think they've seen) in the skies, and she's in favor of revealing any information that might cast light on the answer. It's pretty obvious, however, that this is not even remotely high on her list of concerns. And if the government is covering up some information whose release could legitimately threaten national security, she isn't interested in going there. 

UFO aficionadoes have claimed (illegitimately) that the national-security issue is that if we really knew how many extraterrestrials are buzzing us, it would cause a national panic. Calmer heads point out that all of the secrecy about Area 51 can be explained by the fact that it's where the Air Force has long tested experimental aircraft technology—something that came to light in 2013, when the government declassified a bunch of documents


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Wanting to get to the bottom of the whole thing, Chris Matthews invited our senior editor for space and physics, Clara Moskowitz, to appear on Hardball. As you'll see from this video of the segment, she had no special insight into Hillary's interest, but satisfied the host's curiosity about alien visitations—and also about the radio Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence—with calm confidence. "I like your clear thinking and logic," he says when she's done. So do we.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe