The warm, fuzzy side of climate change: Heftier marmots

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


While polar bears flounder in the face of shrinking ice floes, another furry creature has gotten a boost from climate change. In the past three decades yellow-bellied marmots (Marmota flaviventris) have been fruitful—and multiplied—thanks to longer summers, according to a new study.

In the Rocky Mountains, these marmots usually hibernate for seven to eight months of the year, which make the summer months "a very busy time for them," Arpat Ozgul, of the Department of Life Sciences at Imperial College London and lead author of the new paper, said in a prepared statement. "They have to eat and gain weight, get pregnant, produce offspring and get ready to hibernate again."


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


But as the Colorado summers have grown longer, so too has the time the marmots have to do all of these things—and do them better. This extra preparation (and reproduction) time means that "they are more likely to succeed and survive," said Ozgul, whose results were published online July 21 in the journal Nature (Scientific American is part of Nature Publishing Group).

Marmots in the Upper East River Valley in Colorado, at about three kilometers above sea level, have been trapped and tagged for research purposes at various times each summer since 1976. In those years, the two-year-old adult females were observed to have ballooned from an average August weight of 3.1 kilograms in the first half of the study to more than 3.4 kilograms in the later half of the study. And the population itself has exploded—from an average population growth of 0.56 marmots per year between 1976 and 2001 to a frisky 14.2 marmots each year from 2001 to 2008. (The researchers noted that the population increase was primarily due to better survival rates for older marmots, as marmots born earlier in the season can gain more weight before their first hibernation and have a better chance of reaching a sufficient summer weight in subsequent years.)

The marmots are not yet changing genetically, however, explained Marcel Visser, of the Netherlands Institute of Ecology (who was not involved in the study), in an accompanying essay published in the same issue of Nature. The alterations so far are "likely due to phenotypic plasticity," he wrote.

Visser also noted that the marmots' rapid growth since 2000 has paralleled a regional decline in tall bluebells (Mertensia ciliata), a key component of the animals' diet. Doing without the plant and any key compound that it might provide could mean the marmots would "have needed to be fatter to survive hibernation," he suggested. But the data haven't confirmed whether it was a change in the animals' diet, increase in the amount of food consumed in a summer—or both—that has lead to plumper, hardier marmots.

Although the change in the summer seasons in Colorado has been good for the marmots thus far, the researchers are not convinced that the animals are out of climate woods yet. As summers lengthen and winter snowpack decreases, the feeding seasons could ultimately get drier and less fruitful, likely decreasing the mammals' survival and size.

Sir Brian Hoskins, director of the Grantham Institute for Climate Change at Imperial College calls these growing ground squirrels "climate change 'canaries,'" which can act as "an early warning about the effects of climate change on our natural world." Other woodland creatures have not fared as well in the face of climate change. A study published earlier this year found that populations of the tenacious wolverine are declining, likely due to decreased snowpack.

To prepare for future changes, though, it is important to study both the successes and failures of species as they try to survive climate change, Tim Coulson, also of Imperial College and study coauthor, noted in a prepared statement. "If we can get better at predicting how climate change is likely to influence the natural world, perhaps we can devise ways to help species predicted to be adversely affected by our rapidly changing climate," he said.

Image of marmot pup standing courtesy of Raquel Moncius; image of marmot pup in live trap courtesy of Arpat Ozgul

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe