Uncharted waters: Success!? New Clermont voyage showcases student ingenuity as well as green power

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Editor's Note: A team of Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute students traveled up New York's Hudson River on the New Clermont, a 6.7-meter boat outfitted with a pair of 2.2-kilowatt hydrogen fuel cells to power the boat's motor. The 240-kilometer journey began from Manhattan's Pier 84 on September 21 and concluded October 2 near Rensselaer's campus in Troy, N.Y. This is the fifth and final Scientific American.com blog post chronicling this expedition, called the New Clermont Project.

When the crew members of the New Clermont set off from Manhattan, they hoped that by the time they returned to campus they would have notched a victory for green power. The jury is still out on whether the voyage was successful in its ability to use hydrogen as an alternative to gasoline—the boat limped to port last Friday under its own power but one week behind schedule and only after burning through a couple motors.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


One thing that's clear—the resourceful students behind the project demonstrated boatloads of ingenuity when confronted with a series of equipment failures that could easily have persuaded them to give up. Instead, they isolated the boat's main problem to the fuel cells' tendency to overpower the engine and improvised a solution.

The boat's motors tested just fine prior to the voyage, but repeated use with the hydrogen fuel cells over a number of days ultimately caused them to overheat and fail, says crewmember Casey Hoffman, a second-year mechanical engineering doctoral student at Rensselaer. Independently, the motors and fuel cells are extremely reliable pieces of equipment, he adds. The fuel cells were designed to power forklift trucks with motors much larger than those on the New Clermont. The crew chose them, however, because they knew they would be able to provide sufficient power to the boat's motors while also being compact enough to fid in the boat's cabin.

That cells' power was a blessing and a curse, prompting the crew to replace the motor's original controller with one the students themselves rigged up to ensure that the motor didn't receive more than the 60 amps and 24 volts it was designed to handle.

In the end, Hoffman, a U.S. National Science Foundation's IGERT (Integrative Graduate Education and Research Traineeship) Fellow studying fuel cell electrode manufacturing, says he's proud of the effort and the attention it brought to benefits (and challenges) of relying on alternative power sources.

Image courtesy of Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute

Larry Greenemeier is the associate editor of technology for Scientific American, covering a variety of tech-related topics, including biotech, computers, military tech, nanotech and robots.

More by Larry Greenemeier

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe