Underground Xenon100 experiment closes in on dark matter's hiding place

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


A major dark matter experiment has taken a swipe with its technological net in the hopes of catching some of the elusive particles that make up the universe's missing mass, and once again that net has come up empty. But in swiping and missing, the Xenon100 experiment has closed in a bit tighter on where dark matter—the invisible stuff theorized to outweigh the ordinary matter in the universe by a factor of five—might be hiding.

Xenon100, a tank of liquid xenon deep underground in Italy, has been designed to identify the rare instances when ambient dark matter particles would recoil off regular matter, a subtle collision that should generate a tiny flash of ultraviolet light and a slight electric charge from ionization effects. The detector's 62 kilograms of cryogenic xenon are shielded from non–dark matter contamination by layers of copper, polyethylene, lead, water—and a thick slab of rock overhead that keeps out almost all cosmic rays.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Even so, the detector gets some deceptive signals, for instance stray neutrons from the occasional radioactive decay of atoms within the experimental apparatus and electrons from radioactive krypton contaminating the liquid xenon itself. And after 100.9 days of collecting data in 2010, Xenon100 recorded only three hits that looked like dark matter, an insignificant amount compared to the expected background of about 1.8 such events. In other words, researchers from the project report, "the observation of 3 events does not constitute evidence for dark matter"; those three hits could easily be background noise. The Xenon100 collaboration, led by Elena Aprile of Columbia University, reported the latest results from the experiment in a paper posted online April 13 at arXiv.org, a physics preprint Web site.

So Xenon100 has not found any evidence for dark matter—at least not yet—but that nondetection helps rule out certain parameters for the stuff, in terms of the putative dark matter particle's mass and how often it bumps into ordinary matter. The kinds of dark matter particles now ruled out at the 90 percent confidence level include those that were candidates to explain the signals recorded by two other detectors, CoGeNT in Minnesota and DAMA in Italy, casting doubt on those signals as genuine dark-matter hits. The data even rule out part of the regime where Europe's Large Hadron Collider (LHC) might look for evidence for dark matter as a so-called supersymmetric particle, a hypothetical heavyweight partner to one of the standard elementary particles.

Even though the most recent swipe at dark matter came up empty, the Xenon100 researchers are already back on the hunt. The detector is now taking more data, they report, with fewer false positives thanks to reduced krypton contamination in the detector.

Photo: Xenon100 collaboration

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe