January 25, 2018

Ursula K. Le Guin, 1929–2018

Her work was that of a complete person of letters and an important public intellectual

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American

I was a student and colleague of Le Guin’s, but mainly I was a devoted reader like millions of others, in that her writing meant a great deal to me. The crucial text for me was The Left Hand of Darkness, a great science fiction novel about gender. For me as a young man reading it was a blow to the head and a paradigm buster, and I recommend it to everyone as a fine example of what art can do to enlarge consciousness, and create meaning and value.

I also remember staying up all night to finish her novel The Dispossessed, and feeling afterward electrified by all the possibilities it opened up concerning how the utopian novel could work. I’ve been mining that vein ever since.

Those two books changed me, and really all her writing is of a piece with them, including her poetry, criticism, and fiction at all lengths. Her recently collected short stories, and an omnibus collection of her novellas, are both superb; these are the volumes I would recommend along with the two great novels to anyone picking up her books for the first time. Taken all in all, her work was that of a complete person of letters and an important public intellectual. Until Monday she was one of the greatest living American writers; now she takes her place in American history, and her books will continue to be read by readers grateful for their many gifts.

On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.

As a science fiction writer I have to add that it was very heartening to see how she always advocated for science fiction as a genre and a community. She spoke out for the field fiercely and hilariously; she had edges, and didn’t like snobs. For years she was the point man in science fiction’s long campaign for respectability. Now that reality itself has turned into a science fiction novel, her defense of the field looks thoroughly justified and quite successful. She was a big part of that transformation. She kicked ass. We love her for that as well as for her beautiful fiction.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American