Weather, stray cargo ship and stuck cover conspire to postpone NASA's Ares 1-X test launch

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


NASA's towering Ares 1-X rocket, a test vehicle for a planned crew launcher to replace the space shuttle, remains on the ground at Kennedy Space Center in Florida after the space agency scrubbed its Tuesday launch attempt. The launch team will try again Wednesday in a four-hour launch window that begins at 8:00 A.M. (Eastern Daylight Time).

Tuesday's attempt was ultimately foiled by uncooperative weather, but not before a stuck cover on a probe at the top of the rocket delayed proceedings, as did a cargo ship that wandered into the danger zone under the flight path.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The launch will test components of the Constellation program, a spaceflight system now in development to replace the shuttle, which is scheduled for retirement next year. In the Constellation system, Ares 1 rockets would deliver astronauts to low-Earth orbit.

But with development years behind schedule, an independent panel convened by the Obama administration recently estimated that manned Constellation flights would not begin before 2017. The panel, chaired by former aerospace executive Norman Augustine, also concluded that under NASA's budgetary constraints the agency may have to choose between continuing to develop Ares 1 and extending the life of the International Space Station beyond 2015.

Photo of Ares 1-X on the launch pad Tuesday: NASA TV

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe